11036 stories
·
22 followers

"Hypernormalization" explained

2 Shares
The term has been nicely explained in an Instagram video, and that explanation has been converted to text in a Guardian article this week:
“Hypernormalization” is a heady, $10 word, but it captures the weird, dire atmosphere of the US in 2025.

First articulated in 2005 by scholar Alexei Yurchak to describe the civilian experience in Soviet Russia, hypernormalization describes life in a society where two main things are happening.

The first is people seeing that governing systems and institutions are broken. And the second is that, for reasons including a lack of effective leadership and an inability to imagine how to disrupt the status quo, people carry on with their lives as normal despite systemic dysfunction – give or take a heavy load of fear, dread, denial and dissociation.

“What you are feeling is the disconnect between seeing that systems are failing, that things aren’t working … and yet the institutions and the people in power just are, like, ignoring it and pretending everything is going to go on the way that it has,” Harfoush says in her video.
This is exactly the feeling I have been experiencing for most of this calendar year.
Donald Trump is dismantling government checks and balances in an apparent advance toward a “unitary executive” doctrine that would grant him near-unlimited authority, driving the US toward autocracy. Billionaire tech moguls like Elon Musk are helping the government consolidate power and aggressively reduce the federal workforce. Institutions like the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration, which help keep Americans healthy and informed, are being haphazardly diminished.

Globally, once-in-a-lifetime climate disasters, war and the lingering trauma of Covid continue to unfold, while an explosion of generative AI threatens to destabilize how people think, make a living and relate to each other.

For many in the US, Trump 2.0 is having a devastating effect on daily life. For others, the routines of life continue, albeit threaded with mind-altering horrors: scrolling past an AI-generated cartoon of Ice officers arresting immigrants before dinner, or hearing about starving Palestinian families while on a school run.

Hypernormalization captures this juxtaposition of the dysfunctional and mundane.

“Donald Trump is not something new,” Curtis tells me, calling him “the final pantomime product” of the US government, where the powerful are abandoning any pretense of common, inclusive ideals and instead using their positions to settle scores, reward loyalty and hollow out institutions for personal or political gains.  Trump’s US is “just like Yeltsin in Russia in the 1990s – promising a new kind of democracy, but in reality allowing the oligarchs to loot and distort the society”, says Curtis...
My apologies to The Guardian for excerpting so much of their content for this post, but I feel this concept is important to understand, and I feel some relief in knowing I'm not alone:
Naming an experience can be a form of psychological relief. “The worst thing in the world is to feel that you’re the only one who feels this way and that you are going quietly mad and everyone else is in denial,” says Caroline Hickman, a psychotherapist and instructor at the University of Bath specializing in climate anxiety. “That terrifies people. It traumatizes people.”

People who feel the “wrongness” of current conditions acutely may be experiencing some depression and anxiety, but those feelings can be quite rational – not a symptom of poor mental health, alarmism or a lack of proper perspective, Hickman says.

“What we’re really scared of is that the people in power have not got our back and they don’t give a shit about whether we survive or not,” she says...

Marielle Greguski, 32, a New York City-based retail worker and content creator, posted about everyday life feeling “inconsequential” in the face of political crisis. Greguski says the outcome of the 2024 election reminded her that she lives in a “bubble” of progressive values, and that “there’s the other half of people that are not feeling the same energy and frustration and fear”...

When we feel powerless in the face of bigger problems, we “turn to the only thing that we do have the power over, to try and change for the better”, says Curtis – meaning, typically, ourselves. Anxiety and fear can trap us, leading us to spend more time trying to feel better in small, personal ways, like entertainment and self-care, and less time on activism and community engagement.
More at the link.  It's a real gem.  
Read the whole story
freeAgent
17 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
mareino
5 days ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete

Organic Maps Forked Over Governance Concerns: CoMaps is Born

1 Share
Read the whole story
freeAgent
17 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Salesforce acquires Informatica for $8 billion

1 Share

Salesforce has acquired cloud data management firm Informatica in an $8 billion equity deal, marking a major move in its push to strengthen its AI and data infrastructure capabilities.

The announcement, made Tuesday, comes about a year after early rumors of the acquisition sent both companies’ stock prices sliding. At the time, Informatica denied it was for sale, but a lot can change in a year.

Under the terms of the deal, Salesforce will pay $25 in cash per share for Informatica’s Class A and Class B-1 common stock, adjusting for its prior investment in the company.

Informatica was founded in 1993 and works with more than 5,000 customers across more than 100 countries. The company had a $7.1 billion market cap at the time of publication.

This acquisition will help bolster Salesforce’s agentic AI ambitions, the company’s press release stated, by giving the company more data infrastructure and governance to help its AI agents run more “safely, responsibly, and at scale across the modern enterprise.”

“Together, we’ll supercharge Agentforce, Data Cloud, Tableau, MuleSoft, and Customer 360, enabling autonomous agents to act with intelligence, context, and confidence across every enterprise,” Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said in the press release. “This is a transformational step in delivering enterprise-grade AI that is safe, responsible, and deeply integrated with the world’s data.”

The path to this deal began in April 2024, when reports surfaced that Salesforce was eyeing Informatica. The market reaction was swift — both companies’ shares dipped on fears of a difficult integration or strategic mismatch. Informatica later issued a public statement denying any sale discussions. But what once seemed unlikely is now official.

Techcrunch event

Berkeley, CA | June 5

REGISTER NOW

Informatica isn’t the first data management company Salesforce has acquired in the past year. In September, Salesforce snapped up Own Company for $1.9 billion in cash.

“Data security has never been more critical, and Own’s proven expertise and products will enhance our ability to offer robust data protection and management solutions to our customers,” Salesforce general manager Steve Fisher said in a press release at the time.

TechCrunch has reached out to Salesforce for more information.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
23 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Tesla Is Hiring Humans To Control Its 'Self-Driving' Robotaxis

1 Comment and 2 Shares
  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk has indicated the company is on track to begin its driverless ride-hailing service in Austin, Texas in June.
  • It is hiring plenty of remote operators who will monitor the self-driving taxis to ensure safety.
  • Musk said the initial pilot will involve around 10 EVs and "probably" scale up to a 1,000 robotaxis in a few months.

After promising self-driving cars nearly every year for the past decade, Tesla is now preparing to launch its much-hyped fleet of driverless ride-hailing Model Ys in Austin, Texas, by the end of June. But will they be truly autonomous, or will remote human operators quietly keep things on track from afar?

The latter appears to be a more likely outcome, at least during the early stages of the rollout.

Adam Jonas, an equity analyst at investment bank and research firm Morgan Stanley, said in a note that he visited Tesla’s Palo Alto office recently and learned that the company would be relying on “plenty of tele ops” to ensure the service is safe for public use.

Sure enough, his claim lines up with several teleoperation job postings on Tesla’s careers site.

One job Tesla has posted is titled “C++ Software Engineer, Teleoperation, Optimus & Robotaxi.” Another one is titled, “Robotics Engineer, Teleoperation, Optimus.” The former job description reads: “Our cars and robots operate autonomously in challenging environments. As we iterate on the AI that powers them, we need the ability to access and control them remotely.”

Above all, safety still remains a key concern for these driverless EVs. Tesla has yet to publish safety data for its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software and federal regulators continue to investigate the incidents involving Autopilot and FSD, the advanced driver assistance systems, which have been linked to hundreds of crashes—some of which have been fatal.

But Tesla is confident and is pressing ahead with its robotaxi plans after years of delays. It will begin with a small pilot fleet of around 10 cars in Austin, available only to an “invite-only” group of users. In an interview with CNBC last week, CEO Elon Musk said that the number of robotaxis “will probably be at 1,000 within a few months.”

Musk then doubled down on Tesla’s camera- and AI-based strategy to train its robotic computer that controls the vehicle, dismissing the advanced sensors such as lidar and radar that Waymo has been using. “What we found is that when you have multiple sensors, they tend to get confused. So do you believe the camera or do you believe lidar?” Musk said.

Ironically, Tesla’s latest approach now resembles Waymo’s in at least one way. It will have humans in the loop. According to its job postings, Tesla appears to have built its own virtual reality rig for teleoperators to remotely monitor and intervene if needed.

But the tasks involved go far beyond sitting in a chair in California and steering a stuck robotaxi. These operators will also help develop the interface that connects humans to the cars, essentially designing how remote humans and onboard AI collaborate in real time.

Waymo uses what it calls a “fleet response agent,” a human assistant the vehicle can ping when it gets confused by a complex traffic scenario. These agents can view real-time exterior camera feeds, examine a 3D map of what the vehicle sees and even rewind the footage like a DVR to get better context. “As with the rest of our operations, a helpful human is no more than a touch of a button away,” Waymo said in a blog post.

Tesla's setup appears to be similar. The robotaxis will do the driving, until they don’t. Then a remote human may quietly step in to lend a hand. 

We'll see how it all shakes out in a few weeks—in theory, anyway.

Have a tip? Contact the author: suvrat.kothari@insideevs.com

Got a tip for us? Email: tips@insideevs.com
Read the whole story
mareino
7 hours ago
reply
2024: hail taxi in Texas, driver is Latino

Elon: hold my beer

2025: same Latino driving taxi, but now he's doing it from El Salvador
Washington, District of Columbia
freeAgent
23 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

No more separate app updates? Microsoft wants Windows Update to handle it all now

1 Share
Read the whole story
freeAgent
23 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
LinuxGeek
15 hours ago
Microsoft, following the example of every linux disto.
Share this story
Delete

LexisNexis leaked social security numbers and other personal data of over 364,000 people

1 Share

The data analytics firm LexisNexis Risk Solutions says it suffered a breach that could have exposed the names, Social Security numbers, contact information, and driver’s license numbers of over 364,000 people, as reported earlier by TechCrunch. In a notice filed with the state of Maine, LexisNexis says “an unauthorized third party” accessed its data through a third-party software development platform.

The breach occurred on December 25th, but Lexis Nexis only discovered it on April 1st, 2025, and is just starting to notify people. The company says it “promptly launched an investigation” and “notified law enforcement” once it discovered the breach, adding that the types of information exposed “varied by affected individual.”

LexisNexis spokesperson Jennifer Richman told TechCrunch that an attacker obtained the data through the firm’s GitHub account. Neither LexisNexis nor GitHub immediately responded to The Verge’s request for comment.

LexisNexis is one of the biggest data brokers in the US, as it works to collect and sell vast amounts of personal information for fraud and risk assessment. Last year, LexisNexis was named in a report from The New York Times, which found that automakers had been sharing driving data with the firm that the firm then sold to insurance companies, leading to higher premiums for the drivers. Other than serving as a data broker, LexisNexis also offers access to a database of news articles, public records, and legal documents.

”The LexisNexis breach is yet another example of why we need to rein in the reckless business model of data brokers that traffic in our most sensitive information for profit,” Caroline Kraczon, a law fellow at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said in a statement to The Verge. “Thanks to LexisNexis, hundreds of thousands of individuals’ personal data is now up for grabs by bad actors. That data may be used by foreign adversaries in ways that threaten national security, by fraudsters to target victims for scams, or by abusers to locate and harm survivors of domestic violence.”

Though the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had been working to crack down on data brokers under the Biden administration, those efforts have come to a halt. In February, the Trump-appointed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent ordered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to “stop all rulemaking,” pausing a proposal that would’ve prevented data brokers from selling social security numbers and sensitive financial information. The CFPB officially withdrew the rule earlier this month.

Last year, the House also passed a bill that would block data brokers from selling Americans’ personal information to foreign adversaries, but there hasn’t been much movement since.

Update, May 28th: Added a statement from EPIC.

See More:
Read the whole story
freeAgent
23 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories