12015 stories
·
23 followers

Weekender: The Year of the Whale

1 Share
Weekender: The Year of the Whale

Another year of Whale Hunting draws to a close.

2025 was the year the Mauerberger investigation consumed us – a $1.5 billion money laundering network that connected a South African financier to Thailand's most powerful political dynasty, and eventually led to a $300 million asset seizure. It was the year we received legal threats from KuCoin, traced Iran's shadow fleet, and documented how state capture actually works when you follow the money far enough.

It was also exhausting. The weight of these stories – human trafficking networks, sanctions evasion, the machinery of impunity – doesn't get lighter with time. But neither does the conviction that this work matters.

So as we close out the year, we wanted to do something a little different: a Weekender that's also a year in review. Not a dry retrospective, but a look at what we learned, what we're still chasing, and what kept us sane along the way.

Thank you for being here. For reading, for sharing, for the tips that led to stories we couldn't have found otherwise. The community of Whale Hunters that's grown around this newsletter is the reason we can keep doing this work.

Thank you for reading. Thank you for subscribing. Thank you for caring about our journalism when it would be so much easier not to.

Look out for a soecial two-part magazine piece in Whale Hunting next week, a preview of our new long form publication called The Foundry (debuting next year).

— Bradley and Tom

📰
Get the full story—free with your email.

This story is open to all and our work is available for free to anyone who signs up with their e-mail. But investigations like this aren't cheap. If you believe accountability journalism matters, consider upgrading to a paid subscription – or sending a one-time boost. Every contribution directly funds more reporting like this.

Have a tip? Reach us at:
📩 whalehunting@projectbrazen.com
📧 projectbrazen@protonmail.com
🔒 Secure contact details here.

We protect our sources.

THE HUNT IN 2025

Before we get to the recommendations, a quick look back at the investigations that defined our year.

The $1.5 Billion Network

What started as a tip about a South African financier named Benjamin Mauerberger became our biggest investigation yet. The trail led from New York to Bangkok, from shell companies in Singapore to real estate in London, ultimately exposing a network that targets Americans with fake crypto and romance scams.

These "pig butchering" scams, run by workers held against their will in Cambodia, are generating billions of dollars in profit. Mauerberger was able to bribe Thailand's entire governing class, from Prime Ministers to bureaucrats and police. In December, Thai authorities announced a $300 million asset seizure connected to our reporting – a rare moment of accountability in a story that's far from over.

Following the Money

We traced KuCoin's sanctions evasion infrastructure (and received legal threats for our trouble). We documented Iran's shadow fleet of oil tankers. We mapped the networks that let sanctioned regimes move billions while the rest of us follow the rules.

The Rich List

Jho Low in Shanghai. Khamenei's hidden empire. Thaksin Shinawatra's protection of Mauerberger. The fixers and facilitators who make it all possible. We kept tracking the world's most wanted financial fugitives – and the systems that protect them.

By the Numbers

50+ investigations published.

15+ countries covered.

3 legal threats received.

$300M+ in assets seized connected to our reporting.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
15 minutes ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Offshore wind farms are helping marine life, research suggests

1 Comment

Offshore wind farms boost aquatic ecosystems, new research suggested.

The study found that the rough concrete surfaces of wind turbine foundations allow sessile organisms — immobile living things like barnacles, sea sponges, and algae — to thrive, and form the basis of a complex food chain.

Areas with wind farms had more species of fish, and twice the biomass of comparable regions. Artificial reefs, created by scuttling ships, sinking oil rigs, or dropping rubble into the sea, have long been known to improve aquatic life, so perhaps these findings are unsurprising. But researchers have previously expressed concern over damage to sea beds caused by turbine construction, and leaching of toxic materials from corroding metals.

Tom Chivers


Read the whole story
freeAgent
17 minutes ago
reply
This makes sense. Fishermen have long used "FADs" (Fish Attracting Devices) which are basically just a flowing thing left in the water to encourage a marine ecosystem to develop around it (which attracts fish that the fishermen can catch later). These perform the same function coincidentally. Win-win!
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

When your Apple ID gets banned…

1 Comment

Last Friday, Paris Buttfield-Addison posted 20 Years of Digital Life, Gone in an Instant, thanks to Apple, which kind of blew up.

A major brick-and-mortar store sold an Apple Gift Card that Apple seemingly took offence to, and locked out my entire Apple ID, effectively bricking my devices and my iCloud Account, Apple Developer ID, and everything associated with it, and I have no recourse.

Yeah, effectively, they got a $500 Apple gift card, tried to add it to their account, and this triggered a high enough severity fraud alert in Apple's system that it automatically locked their Apple account. Not good.

The post is a good reminder of how tied to these large companies we really are. I assume most people reading this post have an Apple account, and it's a good exercise to consider how much of your digital life would become inaccessible if you suddenly lost access to that account. Would you lose all your photos? All of your contacts? All of your files? Obviously, the odds of you losing access to your Apple account are exceptionally low, and Buttfield-Addison's experience is the exception, but I think it is a good reminder that completely benign behavior can occasionally lead to serious consequences you would not see coming.

This leads me to three main thoughts on the topic.

First, companies like Apple and Google have over 1 billion users, and their automated systems are likely correct far more often than they are wrong, and I don't think they need to go away. However, a good appeals process is necessary to have, and what happened in this person's case is not ideal. How would someone without a blog and ability to reach an audience have gotten this solved?

Second, when you're locked out of your Apple ID, you should be able to download effectively everything from your account. This would mean that if I was locked out of my Apple ID, maybe I wouldn't be able to use it or add new data to that account. But if I still was able to authenticate, I should be able to download my photos, my files, and other relevant information that I may want to get out. This would make it so that even if I wasn't able to get the attention that this person did and resolve the issue, at least I could still get a backup of my information.

And third, I strongly think that everyone should have some level of redundancy in as much of their digital life as they can. Photos are the big one that I think everyone should be considering. A lot of the things on my computer can be replaced or recreated if they're lost, but not my photos; I can never recreate those moments that I've captured. I personally treat Apple Photos as my de facto photo library, and it works great, but for many years, I had Google Photos also backing up those images, which gave me a second online backup. In the event that my Apple ID was locked, I would still have all of my photos in Google. Since getting a Synology NAS last year, I've actually switched that to having the Synology Photos app automatically back up my photo library to the NAS so that I have local access to all of my photos. Now those photos aren't tied to any online account, they're literally on a hard drive in my house. Consider what's important to you and figure out a solution that works for you.


This story has a happy ending, with Buttfield-Addison posting an update yesterday:

We’re back! A lovely man from Singapore, working for Apple Executive Relations, who has been calling me every so often for a couple of days, has let me know it’s all fixed. It looks like the gift card I tried to redeem, which did not work for me, and did not credit my account, was already redeemed in some way (sounds like classic gift card tampering), and my account was caught by that. Obviously it’s unacceptable that this can happen, and I’m still trying to get more information out of him, but at least things are now mostly working.

Great news, but again, would someone without a blog and a few thousand social media followers have been able to get here? I don't know…

Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 hour ago
reply
I experienced a very similar situation years ago with Google threatening to ban *me* from any Google payment processing related services for life. That would have meant at the time that I would lose my phone service (Google Fi) and the ability to pay for any other Google services, including apps on the app store. That experience prompted me to almost completely de-Google my life. It is certainly convenient to live within walled gardens, but you need an escape hatch at the very least.
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

A Kennedy Center Musician on What It’s Like There Now

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Photograph by Evy Mages.

On a blustery evening in October, Daniel Foster sat onstage at the Kennedy Center, viola in his lap. The National Symphony Orchestra was about to play “Don Juan,” an 1889 tone poem by Richard Strauss about a young libertine in search of the ideal woman. The opening is fiendishly tricky for viola. It has a fast and technical harmonic line that’s musically demanding and strange. Thirty years ago, in his audition to be the NSO’s principal violist, Foster played that excerpt. He won the job.

Foster loves playing Strauss. He loves the “liquid clarinet and the heroic French horn,” the way Strauss “pushes us into the whole range of the instrument,” asking for “the full gamut of moods and types of sound.” It’s fun, he says, to play music so demanding and sublime. Audiences love it, too. In his 30 years with the orchestra, Foster has performed “Don Juan” at various points, and always, the house was nearly full. But lately, crowds at the Kennedy Center have thinned. From the edge of the stage that night, he peered out past the grand, honeycombed chandelier, across the hall’s lush red upholstery, at deserted balconies and clusters of empty seats.

In February, just weeks after his inauguration, Donald Trump pledged to “make the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., GREAT AGAIN.” Citing drag shows and “anti-American propaganda,” he fired 18 Biden-appointed members of the board and made himself its chairman, vowing to rid the institution’s programming of anything woke. The fallout was intense. Performers canceled, employees resigned. Then the boycotts began. The Kennedy Center—home to the National Symphony Orchestra and Washington National Opera, host to an array of high-wattage touring acts—typically operates near capacity. By fall, attendance was down almost 40 percent.

As a citizen, Foster gets it: With Trump as the Kennedy Center’s chairman, he says, some people feel a “visceral thing” about seeing performances there. And he understands the desire to pin a failure on the administration, to send a message about partisan meddling in the arts. But it’s been disorienting to be caught in this maelstrom. As an orchestral violist, Foster spent his life in a notably apolitical job. Then suddenly, the chaos of federal politics infected his work

“Right now, I’m doubling down on what I’m there to do, which is what I love to do: I have music to prepare,” Foster said in November, amid a drumbeat of dire news stories about the Kennedy Center’s financial decline. “I try not to get overly big-picture about things, but the money that comes in from ticket sales is not just gravy.” It’s one of the NSO’s primary revenue streams. And if audiences continue to boycott the Kennedy Center, he’s concerned about collateral damage to the orchestra, in whose orbit he’s spent his whole life.

By the time Foster came into consciousness, he was already playing music. “I don’t have any recollection of choosing it,” he said; lessons were always just something he did. His first teacher was his father, William Foster, a violist who had joined the National Symphony in 1968. Back then, the orchestra played at Constitution Hall. Foster was a toddler in 1971 when the Kennedy Center opened and became the NSO’s permanent home.

Throughout his childhood, Foster was in and out of the Kennedy Center, intimately familiar with its cluttered green rooms and underground parking lot and labyrinthine hallways backstage. It felt special, the days when he was on vacation from school and came to his dad’s rehearsals. If he and his brother got restless, they’d sometimes roam the building’s vacant public spaces—the Hall of Nations, the Hall of States—“kind of mouths agape, looking around” at the scale and grandeur of it all.

He also heard great music. In 1977, the famed cellist Mstislav Rostropovich became the NSO’s music director. An exiled Soviet dissident, Rostropovich brought the orchestra global renown, expanding its size, recruiting preeminent guest artists, and plotting ambitious international tours. His 17-year tenure is legendary. The NSO’s musicians “live in a completely different world now than [before] Slava took the reins,” Foster’s dad told the Washington Post in 1992. The maestro was “able to instill some of [his] genius in the orchestra.”

In some ways, Foster’s path seems preordained. For generations, his family has teemed with musicians: his mother, his brother, various cousins, multiple grandparents. His maternal grandfather, a violinist, is best known for introducing the Suzuki method of music education to the United States. But Foster meant to do something else. He thought he’d study math or philosophy. He nursed a passion for sports. Then, in high school, he came to love the viola, with its throaty, earthbound sound. It suited him, sitting in the middle of the harmony, not carrying the melody but maneuvering beneath it, subtly changing a piece’s emotional mood.

“It’s kind of weird the way my life played out,” Foster recently reflected, “because I was bound and determined to set my own course, and I ended up doing the opposite.” He enrolled at Oberlin College, where his parents and grandparents had gone, and studied viola, just as his father had done. A year after graduating, he got a job in the NSO’s viola section, where he played alongside his dad. For a while, the Fosters shared a music stand onstage. They were colleagues for 25 years.

Daniel and dad William in Moscow in 1993. Photograph courtesy of Daniel Foster.

Foster’s first season with the orchestra was also Rostropovich’s last. And the very first concert he played with the NSO was not at the Kennedy Center but in Moscow’s Red Square, during the Russian constitutional crisis of 1993. The air was near freezing, but still, the concert was packed—100,000 people came, according to press coverage at the time. Among them was Boris Yeltsin, whose presidency was then under threat. The chill knocked instruments out of tune and some musicians wore fingerless gloves, but Foster recalls the concert being “completely epic.” When the orchestra played Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture, the bells of the Kremlin rang out.

During his 30-year career, Foster has had some transcendent moments: performing with Itzhak Perlman and Yo-Yo Ma, playing music he’s loved since he was a child. And just as his dad lived through that lustrous Rostropovich era, Foster feels that the NSO is currently approaching another peak. Music director Gianandrea Noseda, who came to Washington in 2017, has been “the perfect person at the perfect time to unleash all of our potential,” Foster said. Under Noseda, there’s been a different energy in the orchestra, its 96 members reaching for musicianship they couldn’t access before. It’s exciting to be part of. The musicians want the public to see. It’s a bitter irony, then, that just as the orchestra is reaching this artistic pinnacle, much of its audience has disappeared.

The opening theme of “Don Juan” is strident and ascending. As it echoed across the concert hall, Foster sat at the head of the violas, taut with focus, fingers flickering through a vertiginous cascade of notes. The piece meanders through moods: ominous timpani rolls, a sad morass of horns, tinkling bells, the deep bloom of harp. Toward the end, as Don Juan falls into despair, there’s a frenetic collapse, a blurred chromatic dive, the notes piling up into chaos, into stressful minor chords that precede the hero’s death. It’s a bleak ending, but still, the paltry audience cheered.

Musicians are trained to leave their problems backstage. Whatever afflicts them, they still have to focus and play. That’s what Foster’s been trying to do, but it’s tough with all the turbulence—the near-constant bad headlines about the Kennedy Center’s leadership, about a Senate investigation into its finances, about its sudden hosting of partisan events. There was the booing of JD Vance, then the alarming speculation about the opera’s potential relocation, then the multi-week disruption when FIFA took over the Kennedy Center to host its World Cup draw. Meanwhile, Foster has rehearsed and performed and tried not to worry, to varying degrees of success.

Lately, members of the orchestra have strategized about winning their audience back, but nobody quite knows what to do.

Looking out across the hall’s empty seats, he often thinks of the pandemic—of that dismal year when the orchestra couldn’t perform, when he’d drag himself into his music room to practice and think, What am I doing this for? Without people to listen, what’s the purpose? Now, after a concert, Foster can’t help but imagine those who didn’t attend—the orchestra’s regular audience, the subscribers who chose not to return—and wish that they’d come. “I think it would have value to them,” he said. “People want to feel stuff. It makes us feel alive.”

Lately, members of the orchestra have strategized about winning their audience back, but nobody quite knows what to do. For Foster, talking to people—friends, acquaintances, strangers from his neighborhood listserv—has brought a little relief. Even skeptics will listen when he speaks in more personal terms, when he explains what the boycotts have meant to him and his family: to his wife, who plays flute in the Washington National Opera, and his son, who’s a college violinist and might someday want to audition for the NSO.

Often, Foster finds himself puncturing misconceptions. One is that the administration is telling musicians what to play, which—aside from a new policy requiring the national anthem before each concert—he insists is not true. Another is that the orchestra and opera could simply play elsewhere until a new administration is sworn in. But the Kennedy Center, he explains, has the region’s only orchestra pit big enough for grand opera, and no other venue could accommodate the NSO’s busy concert schedule without canceling previously booked acts. Besides, the Kennedy Center provides the orchestra with significant financial support, so leaving would mean losing that money. And the NSO should play at the Kennedy Center, he believes: “We’ve been there for 54 years now. It’s our home.”

Hurting the Kennedy Center to send a political message could also mean the collapse of a 95-year-old orchestra and a 70-year-old opera.

For those who simply refuse to support an institution that’s publicly affiliated with Trump, Foster’s arguments won’t make much difference. Still, he wants them to understand that hurting the Kennedy Center to send a political message could also mean the collapse of a 95-year-old orchestra and a 70-year-old opera, a diminishment of the city’s arts programming, and ripple effects through the community—on the elementary schools for which the NSO regularly gives free concerts, for example, or the soup kitchen near the Kennedy Center where opera musicians sometimes play during meals. “It’s not appropriate for me to tell people what they should and shouldn’t do,” he said. But he does wonder, if all that were lost, whether it would have been worth it to the public in the end, whether the potential consequences of the boycott are proportionate to its aim of perhaps slightly embarrassing Trump.

In discussing the orchestra’s uncertain future, Foster recalled a time during the pandemic when he worried that audiences would never return—that they’d get used to hearing music on a stereo and forget the value of venturing out, in person, to watch. But people did come back, he said, because when musicians play for an audience, something ineffable happens. He described an outdoor performance at Wolf Trap—the first concert he played post-pandemic where nobody was required to mask, where he could see people’s expressions in the crowd. Renée Fleming was singing. And during a few measures of rest, Foster glanced out at the audience and saw them “outside of themselves,” having a collective experience of beauty. “You could see it on their faces—they were transported,” he said. “And that’s it, right there—we feed off of that. That’s what you wish for.” As he described it, he spent about a half a minute in silence, overcome.

This article appears in the January 2025 issue of Washingtonian.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
12 hours ago
reply
Trump plastering his name on the Kennedy Center is in extremely poor taste, but I hope people don't let Trump destroy the arts in DC so easily.
Los Angeles, CA
acdha
1 day ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

new Apple iOS update is wrecking my iPhone

1 Share
Is the latest iPhone operating system aesthetically appealing? No. But is it useful? Also no. At least I have company among the disgruntled.
Read the whole story
freeAgent
12 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

The Government Added a Comments Section to the Epstein Photo Dump

1 Share

Update: After publication of this piece, House Oversight Democrats disabled comments on the photos. The original article follows below.

Thursday afternoon House Democrats publicly released a new trove of photographs they’ve obtained from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein via Dropbox. They left the comments on so anyone who is signed into Dropbox and browsing the material can leave behind their thoughts.

Given that the investigation into Epstein is one of the most closely followed cases in the world and a subject of endless conspiracy theories, and that the committee released the trove of photographs with no context, it’s not surprising that people immediately began commenting on the photographs. 

“Really punchable face,” BedeScarlet—whose avatar is Cloud from Final Fantasy VIIsaid above a picture of New York Times columnist David Brooks. Brooks, who wrote a column about his boredom with the Epstein case in November, attended a dinner with Epstein in 2011 and appears in two photographs in this new document dump.

“Noam Chomsky,” Alya Colours (a frequent Epstein dropbox commenter) said below a photograph of the linguist talking to Epstein on a plane. Below this there is a little prompt from Dropbox asking me to “join the conversation” next to a smiley face.

In another picture, director Woody Allen is bundled up to his eyes in a heavy coat while Epstein side hugs him. “Yep, I’d know that face anywhere,” Susan Brown commented.

Among the pictures is a closeup of a prescription bottle labeled Phenazopyridine. “This is a medication used to treat pain from urinary tract infections,” Rebecca Stinton added, helpfully, in the comments.

“The fuck were they doing all that math for?” BedeScarlet said next to a picture of Epstein in front of a whiteboard covered in equations.

“Shit probably tastes like ass,” he added to a picture of Epstein cooking something in a kitchen.

There are darker and weird photographs in this collection of images that, as of this writing, do not yet have comments. There’s a pair of box springs in an unfinished room lit by the sun. There is a map of Little St James indicating where Epstein wants various buildings constructed. Bill Gates is shown in two photos standing next to women with their faces blocked out.

And then there are the Lolita pictures. A woman’s foot sits in the foreground, a worn annotated copy of Vladimir Nabokov novel Lolita in the background. “She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet teen in one sock,” is written on the foot, a quote from the novel.

These photos are followed by a series of pictures of passports with the information redacted. Some are from Ukraine. There’s one from South Africa and another from the Czech Republic.

The House Democrats allowing the public to comment on these photos is funny and it’s unclear if intentional or a mistake. It’s also a continuation of the just-get-out-there approach when they have published other material, with it sometimes being in unsorted caches that readers then have to dig through. The only grand revelation in the new material is that Brooks was present at a dinner with Epstein in 2011.

“As a journalist, David Brooks regularly attends events to speak with noted and important business leaders to inform his columns, which is exactly what happened at this 2011 event. Mr. Brooks had no contact with him before or after this single attendance at a widely-attended dinner,” a Times spokesperson told Semafor’s Max Tani.

House Oversight Democrats did not immediately return 404 Media’s request for comment.



Read the whole story
freeAgent
13 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories