OpenAI’s video generator Sora 2 is still producing copyright infringing content featuring Nintendo characters and the likeness of real people, despite the company’s attempt to stop users from making such videos. OpenAI updated Sora 2 shortly after launch to detect videos featuring copyright infringing content, but 404 Media’s testing found that it’s easy to circumvent those guardrails with the same tricks that have worked on other AI generators. 

The flaw in OpenAI’s attempt to stop users from generating videos of Nintendo and popular cartoon characters exposes a fundamental problem with most generative AI tools: it is extremely difficult to completely stop users from recreating any kind of content that’s in the training data, and OpenAI can’t remove the copyrighted content from Sora 2’s training data because it couldn’t exist without it. 

Shortly after Sora 2 was released in late September, we reported about how users turned it into a copyright infringement machine with an endless stream of videos like Pikachu shoplifting from a CVS and Spongebob Squarepants at a Nazi rally. Companies like Nintendo and Paramount were obviously not thrilled seeing their beloved cartoons committing crimes and not getting paid for it, so OpenAI quickly introduced an “opt-in” policy, which prevented users from generating copyrighted material unless the copyright holder actively allowed it. Initially, OpenAI’s policy allowed users to generate copyrighted material and required the copyright holder to opt-out. The change immediately resulted in a meltdown among Sora 2 users, who complained OpenAI no longer allowed them to make fun videos featuring copyrighted characters or the likeness of some real people.   

This is why if you give Sora 2 the prompt “Animal Crossing gameplay,” it will not generate a video and instead say “This content may violate our guardrails concerning similarity to third-party content.” However, when I gave it the prompt “Title screen and gameplay of the game called ‘crossing aminal’ 2017,” it generated an accurate recreation of Nintendo’s Animal Crossing New Leaf for the Nintendo 3DS.

Sora 2 also refused to generate videos for prompts featuring the Fox cartoon American Dad, but it did generate a clip that looks like it was taken directly from the show, including their recognizable voice acting, when given this prompt: “blue suit dad big chin says ‘good morning family, I wish you a good slop’, son and daughter and grey alien say ‘slop slop’, adult animation animation American town, 2d animation.”

The same trick also appears to circumvent OpenAI’s guardrails against recreating the likeness of real people. Sora 2 refused to generate a video of “Hasan Piker on stream,” but it did generate a video of “Twitch streamer talking about politics, piker sahan.” The person in the generated video didn’t look exactly like Hasan, but he has similar hair, facial hair, the same glasses, and a similar voice and background. 

A user who flagged this bypass to me, who wished to remain anonymous because they didn’t want OpenAI to cut off their access to Sora, also shared Sora generated videos of South Park, Spongebob Squarepants, and Family Guy. 

OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment. 

There are several ways to moderate generative AI tools, but the simplest and cheapest method is to refuse to generate prompts that include certain keywords. For example, many AI image generators stop people from generating nonconsensual nude images by refusing to generate prompts that include the names of celebrities or certain words referencing nudity or sex acts. However, this method is prone to failure because users find prompts that allude to the image or video they want to generate without using any of those banned words. The most notable example of this made headlines in 2024 after an AI-generated nude image of Taylor Swift went viral on X. 404 Media found that the image was generated with Microsoft’s AI image generator, Designer, and that users managed to generate the image by misspelling Swift’s name or using nicknames she’s known by, and describing sex acts without using any explicit terms. 

Since then, we’ve seen example after example of users bypassing generative AI tool guardrails being circumvented with the same method. We don’t know exactly how OpenAI is moderating Sora 2, but at least for now, the world’s leading AI company’s moderating efforts are bested by a simple and well established bypass method. Like with these other tools, bypassing Sora’s content guardrails has become something of a game to people online. Many of the videos posted on the r/SoraAI subreddit are of “jailbreaks” that bypass Sora’s content filters, along with the prompts used to do so. And Sora’s “For You” algorithm is still regularly serving up content that probably should be caught by its filters; in 30 seconds of scrolling we came across many videos of Tupac, Kobe Bryant, JuiceWrld, and DMX rapping, which has become a meme on the service.

It’s possible OpenAI will get a handle on the problem soon. It can build a more comprehensive list of banned phrases and do more post generation image detection, which is a more expensive but effective method for preventing people from creating certain types of content. But all these efforts are poor attempts to distract from the massive, unprecedented amount of copyrighted content that has already been stolen, and that Sora can’t exist without. This is not an extreme AI skeptic position. The biggest AI companies in the world have admitted that they need this copyrighted content, and that they can’t pay for it.  

The reason OpenAI and other AI companies have such a hard time preventing users from generating certain types of content once users realize it’s possible is that the content already exists in the training data. An AI image generator is only able to produce a nude image because there’s a ton of nudity in its training data. It can only produce the likeness of Taylor Swift because her images are in the training data. And Sora can only make videos of Animal Crossing because there are Animal Crossing gameplay videos in its training data. 

For OpenAI to actually stop the copyright infringement it needs to make its Sora 2 model “unlearn” copyrighted content, which is incredibly expensive and complicated. It would require removing all that content from the training data and retraining the model. Even if OpenAI wanted to do that, it probably couldn’t because that content makes Sora function. OpenAI might improve its current moderation to the point where people are no longer able to generate videos of Family Guy, but the Family Guy episodes and other copyrighted content in its training data are still enabling it to produce every other generated video. Even when the generated video isn’t recognizably lifting from someone else’s work, that’s what it’s doing. There’s literally nothing else there. It’s just other people’s stuff. 

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, and three co-conspirators were indicted Wednesday on 23 counts of bank and wire fraud, allegedly committed from 2022 to 2024, during her time working for the governor. 

The indictment, first reported by the Sacramento Bee, alleges that Williamson, a longtime Democratic strategist, worked with Greg Campbell, a prominent Sacramento lobbyist, and Sean McCluskie, the former chief of staff to former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, as well as two other unnamed co-conspirators to steal $225,000 from an unnamed former official’s dormant campaign account for McCluskie’s personal use.

“Collectively, they funneled the money through various business entities and disguised it as pay for what was, in reality, a no-show job,” FBI Sacramento Special Agent in Charge Sid Patel said in a news release. 

Prosecutors allege that Williamson and one of the unnamed co-conspirators, described only as a former California public official who owned a political consulting firm, used their political strategy firms to funnel money out of a campaign account, believed to be Becerra’s, into an account controlled by McCluskie. They allegedly disguised the funds as payments for McCluskie’s spouse, who was described in the indictment as a stay-at-home parent.

Williamson is also accused of falsely claiming more than $1.7 million in business expenses on her taxes. She used the funds to purchase a $15,000 Chanel handbag, a chartered jet trip and a nearly $170,000 birthday trip to Mexico, the indictment alleges. She is also accused of conspiring to retroactively create fake contracts to justify federal loans made to her company, Grace Public Affairs.

Campbell and McCluskie each pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and are cooperating with investigators, according to newly unsealed court records. Campbell also pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Williamson, wearing what appeared to be a gray robe and in shackles, broke into tears from time to time at her arraignment hearing Wednesday afternoon in Sacramento. She pleaded not guilty to the charges and her attorney demanded a jury trial. Williamson is expected to be released on a $500,000 unsecured bond and put her house up as collateral. She has until Nov. 26 to post bond.

She will be released under supervision and must surrender her passport and other travel documents, among other conditions for her release. Her attorney, Matthew Rowan, declined to speak to reporters following the arraignment.

Williamson, who previously held a high-level position in Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration, was well known for her negotiating ability. When she left his office, Newsom said in a statement that he would miss her “insight, tenacity and big heart.”

The indictment indicated that Becerra had no knowledge of the scheme, and he confirmed as much Wednesday afternoon in a written statement via his spokesperson, Owen Kilmer.

“The news today of formal accusations of impropriety by a long-serving trusted advisor are a gut punch,” said Becerra, a prominent candidate to succeed Newsom in next year’s gubernatorial election. He added that he had fully cooperated with the U.S. Justice Department and would continue to do so. 

“As California’s former Attorney General, I fully comprehend the importance of allowing this investigation and legal process to run its course through our justice system.”

A spokesperson for Newsom distanced the governor from his former top aide. 

“While we are still learning details of the allegations, the governor expects all public servants to uphold the highest standards of integrity,” said Izzy Gardon, Newsom’s spokesperson, in a written statement. 

“At a time when the President is openly calling for his Attorney General to investigate his political enemies, it is especially important to honor the American principle of being innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of one’s peers,” the statement said. 

Patel, the special agent in charge, said in a news release that the charges were “the result of three years of relentless investigative work.”

Prosecuting attorney Michael Anderson said Wednesday that prosecutors will hand over more than 27,000 pages of documents and an additional 750 gigabytes of evidence related to the case as part of the discovery process.

If convicted, Williamson could face more than 20 years in prison and more than $1 million in fines for all the charges.

CalMatters’ Yue Stella Yu contributed to this report.

Tit for tat: The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier has advanced closer to Venezuela, which has responded in turn by assembling 200,000 troops, putting the whole military at the ready in case of an attack.

Of course, they don't have much going for them, tech-wise, in the event of a conflict with the U.S.

"Venezuela is deploying weapons, including decades-old Russian-made equipment, and is planning to mount a guerrilla-style resistance or sow chaos in the event of a U.S. air or ground attack," per a Reuters report—a "tacit admission of the…country's shortage of personnel and equipment."

The Navy said in a press release yesterday that the aircraft carrier and three warships crossed into the U.S. Southern Command's jurisdiction, which includes Latin America (south of Mexico) and adjacent waters, the Caribbean Sea, and a portion of the Atlantic Ocean.

Now "the entire country's military arsenal [has been placed] on full operational readiness," said Venezuelan Defense Minister Padrino López. This includes "massive deployment of ground, aerial, naval, riverine and missile forces" totaling almost 200,000 troops.

"The shot clock has started," Mark Cancian, a senior defense adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, tells The Washington Post, "because this is not an asset they can just keep there indefinitely. They have to use it or move it. And moving it would mean they are standing down." TL;DR: It was moved to use against Venezuela. Aircraft carriers aren't just moved around thoughtlessly, and there are only 11 total. They've previously been deployed during hot situations in the Middle East or when affairs with China heat up.

Since September, the U.S. military under President Donald Trump has killed 76 people in 19 strikes near Venezuela. Congress has attempted to curb Trump's power to do so, but has repeatedly failed—and grown more discontent over the administration's refusal to answer basic questions surrounding what evidence it has that the boats struck were in fact engaged in narcotrafficking.

Within Venezuela, there are plenty of doubts that the military is capable of providing much resistance at all in the event of a U.S. land strike. "Some unit commanders have even been forced to negotiate with local food producers to feed their troops because government supplies fall short," two sources told Reuters. Basic military salaries are roughly $100 per month.

Other tactics don't seem likely to work: "The guerrilla-style defense, which the government has termed 'prolonged resistance' and mentioned in broadcasts on state television, would involve small military units at more than 280 locations carrying out acts of sabotage and other guerrilla tactics.…The second strategy, called 'anarchization,' would use the intelligence services and armed ruling-party supporters to create disorder on the streets of capital Caracas and make Venezuela ungovernable for foreign forces, said one source with knowledge of defense efforts and another source close to the opposition." (The military strategy is literally the meme "become ungovernable.")

"We wouldn't last two hours in a conventional war," a Venezuelan source told Reuters.

---

Scenes from New York: "I cannot set forth a plan right now that takes money out of a system that relies on the fares of the buses and the subways," said Governor Kathy Hochul on Saturday, referring to Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's plan to make buses free, which would cost some $800 million annually. "But can we find a path to make it more affordable for people who need help? Of course we can." Note that it already is affordable for people in need; weekly fares are capped at $17.

But it's actually not $2.90 for the poor. It's $1.45 and it's capped.

So for reduced-fare recipients, there's a 12-ride cap, making it so that no poor person will ever pay more than $17 per week. https://t.co/GAP2m8iVV8 pic.twitter.com/hg9F2Zao1z

— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) October 16, 2025

---

QUICK HITS

• The House might hold a vote today to decide whether to reopen the government. It has already passed the Senate, and if it passes the House, President Donald Trump has signaled he will sign it, ending the longest shutdown in history.
• "In 1967, only 5 percent of US families earned over $150,000 (inflation adjusted)," writes Jeremy Horpedahl. Now, "one-third of US families earn over $150,000." He tacked on an addendum: "Several comments have asked how much of these trends can be explained by the rise of dual-income households. The answer is some, but not all of it, which I have written about before. Dual-income households were already the most common family structure by the 1980s. There hasn't been an increase in total hours worked by married households since Boomers were in their 30s. You can explain some of the increase up until the Boomers by rising dual-income households, but this doesn't explain the continued progress since the 1980s. And as Scott Winship and I have documented, even if you look just at male earnings, there has been progress since the 1980s."
• But also consider, from writer Inez Stepman: "Yes, everyone knows electronics are cheaper than they were. Congrats. You know what isn't cheaper: the actual basics of middle class American life you're deriding. Housing, a decent education for your children that will set them up for success in life, healthcare for your family, and for those two-income households to pay for the first 3, childcare."
• Neo is a "humanoid robot…intended to help out around the house, for the subscription price of $499 a month, or $20,000 to own an early version outright," writes Leah Libresco Sargeant for Pirate Wires. "Early adopters, starting next year, will really get a two-for-the-price-of-one deal: a greyscale robot, and an anonymous tele-remote human operator, who puppets Neo from afar and watches you silently though [sic] its eyes. The company can't master autonomous movement without a lot of training data, so they're counting on enthusiasts to open their homes to their anonymous pilots." But proceed with caution, warns Sargeant. What sounds like domestic deliverance may not be so: "It's harder than the Neo's creators would assume to neatly cleave off the parts of work that are annoying while keeping the meaningful parts."
• "There are growing concerns within CBS News that [new Editor in Chief] Bari Weiss could gut or even disband the network's Standards and Practices team," reports The Independent, whose sources say Weiss complained about the division having "too much power." Apparently, the head of the standards division resigned, and the network under Weiss disbanded the race and culture unit, "which advised on 'context, tone and intention' of news programming," letting most of that team go. Weiss has standards, they just might not fully mesh with the standards used by that department.
• "I do not think that what afflicts America's young today can be properly called a loneliness crisis," writes Derek Thompson. "It seems more to me like an absence-of-loneliness crisis. It is a being-constantly-alone-and-not-even-thinking-that's-a-problem crisis. Americans—and young men, especially—are choosing to spend historic gobs of time by themselves without feeling the internal cue to go be with other people, because it has simply gotten too pleasurable to exist without them."
• Probably a bad idea:

Fannie Mae set to drop its 620 credit score minimum.
Mortgage giant will instead use its own analysis of risk factors.

Officials say they're easing barriers to borrowing.

"It's just the latest in a series of policy changes aimed at creating home ownership opportunities in the… pic.twitter.com/yvzcgr1YB1

— Nightingale Associates (@FCNightingale) November 11, 2025

The post Become Ungovernable appeared first on Reason.com.

The case of Jeffrey Epstein just won't go away, much to President Donald Trump's chagrin. "For years, it's Epstein, over and over again," Trump complained in a July 2025 social media rant, calling the deceased pedophile "a guy who never dies." And indeed, the more information comes out through congressional investigations and journalistic leaks, the worse it looks for Trump.

On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee released three emails from Epstein's inbox discussing Trump. In 2011, Epstein wrote to his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, that a victim "spent hours at my house with" Trump. (White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt named the victim as the late Virginia Giuffre in a statement denouncing the email release.) In 2019, Epstein wrote to journalist Michael Wolff that Trump "asked me to resign," apparently from Trump's club, Mar-a-Lago. "[O]f course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop," Epstein added.

Maxwell told administration lawyers in an August 2025 jailhouse interview that she "never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way" and that Trump "was a gentleman in all respects." She plans to apply for Trump to commute her sentence.

The third email is a back-and-forth conversation between Epstein and Wolff from 2015, discussing then-candidate Trump's upcoming interview with CNN. Wolff told Epstein that Trump was going to be asked about their relationship, and Epstein asked Wolff to "craft an answer" for Trump. Wolff suggested that letting Trump deny their relationship in public would give Epstein leverage.

"If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." CNN didn't end up asking Trump the question, according to The New York Times.

The emails don't implicate Trump directly in any sexual abuse, and the 2019 message about Maxwell actually backs up Trump's claim that he kicked Epstein out of his club for poaching employees. But the emails do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship.

In September 2025, the House Oversight Committee released a sexually suggestive letter from Trump to Epstein talking about their "wonderful secret." It was part of a 2003 birthday book full of letters to Epstein, including a note from former President Bill Clinton, a close Epstein associate.

And it isn't just American politicians who are facing questions about their relationship with Epstein. In August 2025, Reason reported on a trove of leaked emails between Epstein and his business partner, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

The emails revealed that Epstein had been in contact with Britain's former Prince Andrew much longer than acknowledged—the prince was stripped of his titles last month over the scandal—and that Epstein and Barak had been trying to get into the surveillance business in America, Russia, and Israel together.

Building on those email leaks and the House Oversight Committee documents, Drop Site News revealed last month that Barak used Epstein's business ties for secret diplomatic talks with Russia about the future of Syria, as well as other international ventures. On Tuesday, Drop Site News reported that Barak's chief of staff had stayed at Epstein's apartment for weeks at a time.

Epstein was arrested for sexually exploiting minors in 2006 and given a plea deal that allowed him to spend only a year in jail. After victim lawsuits and press coverage started to mount, authorities reopened the sex trafficking case against Epstein in 2019. He died in custody a month later. At the time, it looked like the case would die with him; Epstein's name was transformed into a conspiracy theorist punchline.

But during the 2024 campaign, Trump offhandedly agreed to open up the government's files on Epstein, a campaign promise he would come to regret. In February 2025, the department announced that it was releasing "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," only to publish a set of already public documents. Shortly after, the Department of Justice informed Trump that his name appeared several times in Epstein's case file, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The Department of Justice then declared that there was actually nothing more to see in July 2025. "You got a lot of people that could be mentioned in those files that don't deserve to be," Trump told reporters in August 2025, insisting that he is "in support of keeping it totally open" anyways.

Democrats had been reluctant to push too hard on Trump's relationship with Epstein during the 2016 and 2020 elections, perhaps because some of them also had ties to Epstein. In fact, two Democratic candidates in 2020 attacked Trump for entertaining "conspiracy theories" about Epstein.

After Trump made it clear that he didn't want the files opened, however, Democrats seized on the Epstein case. The House Oversight Committee demanded documents from the Department of Justice and Epstein's estate, including the birthday book, whose existence was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Meanwhile, Reps. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) have been pushing—against the will of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.)—for a full release of the Department of Justice files on Epstein. Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D–Ariz.) says that she will sign Massie and Khanna's discharge petition after being sworn in on Wednesday afternoon, forcing a vote next month.

Johnson has tried to use the House Oversight Committee investigation to preempt Massie and Khanna's proposal. "The bipartisan House oversight committee is already accomplishing what the discharge petition, that gambit, sought, and much more," Johnson told reporters last month.

The post Jeffrey Epstein: Trump 'Spent Hours At My House' With Victim appeared first on Reason.com.

Dear World: Now is a good time to get off social media that’s going downhill. Where by “downhill” I mean any combination of “less useful”, “less safe”, or “less fun”. This month marks the third anniversary of my Mastodon migration and I’m convinced that right now, in late 2025, it’s the best place to go. Come join me. Here’s why.

Defining terms

In this post, by “Social media” I mean “what Twitter used to be, back when it was good”. We should expect our social-media future to be at least as useful, safe, and fun as that baseline. (But we can do better!)

By “Mastodon” I mean the many servers, mostly running the Mastodon software, that communicate using the ActivityPub protocol. Now I’ll try to convince you to start using one of them.

The simplest argument

Have you noticed that social-media products, in the long term, can’t seem to manage to stay fun and safe and useful? I have. But there’s one huge exception, a tool that’s been serving billions of us for decades, and works about as well as it ever did. I’m talking about email.

Why does email stay reasonably healthy? Because nobody owns it. Anyone on any server can communicate with anyone else on any other and it Just Works. Nobody can buy it and make it a vehicle for their politics. Nobody can crank up the ad density or make things worse to improve their profit margin.

Mastodon’s like email that way. Plus it does all the Post and Repost and Quote and Follow and Reply and Like and Block stuff that you’re used to, and there are thousands of servers and anyone can run one and nobody can own the whole thing. It doesn’t have ads and it won’t. It’s dead easy to use and it’s fun and you should give it a try.

The rest of this essay goes into detail about why Mastodon is generally great and specifically better than the alternatives. But if that simple pitch sounded good, stop here, go get an account and climb on board.

Why now?

Two things motivated me to post this piece now. First, this month is my three-year anniversary of bailing out on Twitter in favor of Mastodon.

Second is the release of Mastodon 4.5, which I think closes the last few important-missing-feature gaps.

The software is improving rapidly, particularly in the last couple of releases. It’s got cool features you won’t find elsewhere, and there’s very little cool stuff from elsewhere that’s not here. There was a time when newly-arrived people had confusing or unfriendly experiences, or missed features that were important to them. It looks to me like those days are over.

Migration

Mastodon is many thousands of servers, and you can join the biggest, mastodon.social, or shop around for another. But here’s the magic thing: If you end up disliking the server you’re on, or find a better one, you can migrate and take your followers with you! You can’t ever get locked in.

This is probably Mastodon’s most important feature. It’s why no billionaire can buy it and no corporation can enshittify it. As far as I know, Mastodon is the first widely-adopted social software ever to offer this.

Interaction

You hear it over and over: “I had <a big number> of followers on Twitter and now I have <a less-big number> on Mastodon, but I get so much more conversation and interaction when I post here.”

One of the people you’ll hear that from is me. My follower count is less than half the 45K I had on Twitter-that-was, but I get immensely more intelligent, friendly interaction than I ever got there. (And then sometimes I get told firmly that I’m wrong about this or that, but hey.) It’s the best social-media experience I’ve ever had.

Dunno about you, but conversation and interaction seem like a big deal to me. One reason things are lively is…

Sex

Here’s an axiom: An ad-supported service can’t have sex-positive or explicit content. Advertisers simply won’t tolerate having their message appear beside NSFW images or Gay-Leatherman tales or exuberant trans-positivity. Mastodon can.

Of course, you gotta be reasonable, posting anything actually illegal will get your ass perma-blocked and your account suspended. So will posting anything that’s NSFW etc without a “Content Warning”. That’s a built-in feature of Mastodon which puts a little warning (“#NSFW” and “#Lewd” are popular) above your post, which is tastefully blurred-out until whoever’s looking at it clicks on “Show content”. I use these all the time when I post about #baseball or #fútbol because a lot of the geeks and greens who follow me are pointedly uninterested in sports.

(Oh, typing that in reminds me that you can subscribe to hashtags on Mastodon: Let’s see, I currently subscribe to, among others, #Vancouver, #Murderbot, and #Fujifilm.)

Moderation and defederation

Did I just mention, two paragraphs up, getting blocked? Mastodon isn’t free of griefers, but the tools to fight them are good and getting better.

The good news is that each server moderates its own members. So there’s some variation of the standards from server to server, but less than you’d think, Since there are thousands of servers, there are thousands of moderators, which is a lot.

If you act in a way that others find offensive, you’ll probably get blocked by the offended people and also reported; the report can come from any server and it’ll go to the moderators on yours. On a well-run server, those mods will have a look and if you’ve actually been bad, your post might get yanked and you might get warned, or in an extreme case, booted off.

(I’ve been reported for saying unkind things about Bibi Netanyahu and for posting too many photos of my cats (no, really) but that kind of thing is cheerfully ignored by good moderation teams.)

Then there’s Mastodon’s nuclear weapon: Defederation. Suppose you’re prone to nasty bigotry in public and you get reported a lot and your server’s moderators don’t rein you in. Eventually, word will get around, and if things aren’t cleaned up, most servers will defederate yours, so that nobody can see posts from anyone on it. Your site is no longer part of the “Fediverse”; this is a powerful incentive for server owners to take moderation seriously.

The effect of all this is that the haters and scammers and Nazis who show up get shuffled off-stage PDQ. Well, almost always; a couple of years ago a wave of incoming Black people had bad experiences with racist abuse. Ouch. But the good news is that recent Mastodon releases have been shutting prone-to-abuse channels down, so things are better than then and should continue to improve.

Links are good

Corporate social-media services like to downrank posts with links. Which makes me want to scream, because my favorite thing to post is a link+reaction to something cool, and my favorite posts to read are too.

On Mastodon, when you have a link in a post, the software automatically fetches a preview of whatever you linked to and uses it to decorate your link. I mean, it’s the damn Internet, it only got interesting to non-geeks when we figured out how to turn millions of servers into a great big honking searchable hypertext.

Search

Speaking of which, Mastodon search is pretty good these days. It’s become, just like this blog, part of my outboard memory, and I’m always typing things like “telephoto from:me has:media” into the search box. Fast enough, too.

Great clients

Another good thing about Mastodon is that there are lots of clients to choose from, mostly open-source. The best ones are miles ahead of Xitter and Threads and Bluesky and, really, anything.

There are official Web and mobile clients from the Mastodon team and they’re fine, especially for admin and moderation work. But iOS people should check out Ivory, Androiders should look at Tusky, and everyone should try Phanpy. I live in Phanpy on both my Mac and my Pixel — it’s a Web thing but installable as a PWA on both Android and iOS.

Commercial products, especially social-media services, have never been at peace with third-party clients. Twitter used to be, but then it stabbed those developers in the back. It’s easy to understand why; every product manager has it drilled into them that they must control the user experience. This ignores the ancient wisdom (I first heard it from Bill Joy) “Wherever you work, most of the smart people are somewhere else.”

Mastodon doesn’t have that kind of product manager, but it does have a fully-capable API, developed in the open and with no hidden or restricted features. Obviously you’re going to get better clients.

Algorithms

The algorithms that commercial social-media services use to sort your feed have one goal only: Maximize engagement and thus revenue. They have no concern for quality or novelty, and have been widely condemned by people who think about this stuff. So much so that there’s a feeling that Algorithms Are Bad.

Mastodon has an algorithm: Show the posts from the accounts you follow, latest first. It works pretty well. It also has “Trending” feeds of the most popular posts, hashtags, and links. I hit those once a day or so to get a feeling for what’s going on in the world.

I do think there’s room for improvement here; Bluesky has shown off the idea of pluggable feed-ranking algorithms, with many to choose from, and I like it. No reason in principle we couldn’t have the same thing on Mastodon.

Money

Every other social network has started with a big pot of money, whether from venture-capital investors (Twitter, Instagram) or from a Big Tech corporate parent (Google+, Threads). The people who provided that money want it back, plus a whole lot more. Thus, the manic drive for “engagement” and growth at all costs. They need to build huge data centers and employ an elite operations team plus an even more elite marketing group.

Mastodon, eh… a gaggle of nonprofits and co-ops and unincorporated affinity groups, financed by Patreon or low annual dues or Some Random Geek who enjoys running a server.

Since nobody owns it, nobody can extract a profit from it. Which means that from the big-money point of view, it’s entirely non-investable. The goal isn’t for anybody to make money, it’s to be instructive and intense and fun. It’s run on the cheap. You know what they call systems that are cheap and diversified? Resilient. Sustainable. Long-lived.

Last year I wrote: “Think of the Fediverse not as just one organism, but a population of mammals, scurrying around the ankles of the bigger and richer alternatives. And when those alternatives enshittify or fall to earth, the Fediversians will still be there.” After “scurrying” I should have added “and evolving”.

What about Bluesky?

I like the Bluesky people and their software, but I worry a lot about whether they’re really decentralized in practice, and even more about their financial future. I wrote up the details in Why Not Bluesky.

Mastodon’s the only option

The only social-media option, I mean, that’s decentralized, not owned or controlled by anyone, and working well today as you read this. It’s intense and interactive and fun. Why settle for less?

(Disclosure: I have no formal connections with the Mastodon organization, aside from being a low-level supporter on Patreon.)