10511 stories
·
22 followers

Microsoft tricks people into Bing by making it look like Google Search

1 Comment

I say the whole world must learn of our peaceful ways by force!

This famous line from Futurama perfectly sums up some of Microsoft's attempts to make sure people do not use rival services. If you cannot make your users stick willingly, do it by force or other annoying tricks or dirty patterns. From injecting ads on competing websites to malware-like banners—Windows users have already seen plenty. Now, Microsoft has come up with another trick quite literally to fool inexperienced users into Bing.

Users noticed that an attempt to open Google using Bing results in the latter disguising itself as Google's search engine with its centered art and a search bar. The page even scrolls itself down a bit to hide the typical Microsoft Bing header with its logo, the standard search bar, and tabs like Copilot, Images, Videos, Maps, etc.

Bing changing its looks when searching for google

The traditional search results are still there, but they are much lower your eyesight. Then, typing anything into the search bar results in the user searching with Bing.

Microsoft also tries to pull some heartstrings by stating that "every search brings you closer to a free donation for over 2 million nonprofits!" right below the search bar. This deliberately crafted behavior clearly preys on inexperienced or inattentive users who are accustomed to the Google Search home page (for many users, Edge is just a Chrome downloader, and Bing is a shortcut to Google). Now, with the media picking up the story, it will be interesting to see whether Microsoft will remove this new thing or not.

As a reminder, if you use Microsoft Edge, you can always switch to Google Search in the address bar by heading to Settings > Privacy, search, and services > Address bar and search > Search engine used in the address bar.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
2 hours ago
reply
Interestingly, Bing is *not* exhibiting this behavior on Firefox, but it is also doing it on Safari.
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Sam Altman says “we are now confident we know how to build AGI”

1 Comment

On Sunday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman offered two eye-catching predictions about the near-future of artificial intelligence. In a post titled "Reflections" on his personal blog, Altman wrote, "We are now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it." He added, "We believe that, in 2025, we may see the first AI agents 'join the workforce' and materially change the output of companies."

Both statements are notable coming from Altman, who has served as the leader of OpenAI during the rise of mainstream generative AI products such as ChatGPT. AI agents are the latest marketing trend in AI, allowing AI models to take action on a user's behalf. However, critics of the company and Altman immediately took aim at the statements on social media.

"We are now confident that we can spin bullshit at unprecedented levels, and get away with it," wrote frequent OpenAI critic Gary Marcus in response to Altman's post. "So we now aspire to aim beyond that, to hype in purest sense of that word. We love our products, but we are here for the glorious next rounds of funding. With infinite funding, we can control the universe."

AGI, short for "artificial general intelligence," is a nebulous term that OpenAI typically defines as "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work." Elsewhere in the field, AGI typically means an adaptable AI model that can generalize (apply existing knowledge to novel situations) beyond specific examples found in its training data, similar to how some humans can do almost any kind of work after having been shown few examples of how to do a task.

According to a longstanding investment rule at OpenAI, the rights over developed AGI technology are excluded from its IP investment contracts with companies such as Microsoft. In a recently revealed financial agreement between the two companies, the firms clarified that "AGI" will have been achieved at OpenAI when one of its AI models generates at least $100 billion in profits.

Tech companies don't say this out loud very often, but AGI would be useful for them because it could replace many human employees with software, automating information jobs and reducing labor costs while also boosting productivity. The potential societal downsides of this could be considerable, and those implications extend far beyond the scope of this article. But the potential economic shock of inventing artificial knowledge workers has not escaped Altman, who has forecast the need for universal basic income as a potential antidote for what he sees coming.

Criticism of predictions of impending AGI

Artificial workers or not, some people have already been calling "BS" on Altman's optimism. It's nothing new. Marcus, a professor emeritus of psychology and neural science at New York University, often serves as a public foil to Altman's pronouncements, a trend that largely began when Marcus appeared before the US Senate in a May 2023 hearing as a skeptical counterpoint to Altman's testimony during the same session.

On Sunday, Marcus laid out his most recent criticisms of OpenAI's prediction of achieving AGI soon in a series of posts where he detailed how current language models sometimes fail at basic tasks like math problems, "commonsense reasoning," and maintaining accuracy when faced with novel problems.

OpenAI's current "best" released AI model, o1-pro, what you might call a "simulated reasoning" or SR model, reportedly performs well on some mathematical and scientific tasks but still shares weaknesses with OpenAI's GPT-4o large language model, such as failing to generalize well beyond its training data. And it may not be as strong as OpenAI claims in some cases.

For example, Marcus cited a recent benchmark conducted by All Hands AI that reportedly shows that OpenAI's o1 model scored only 30 percent on SWE-Bench verified problems (a set of GitHub-based problems), which is below OpenAI's claimed 48.9 percent performance rate, while Anthropic's Claude Sonnet (which is not purported to be an SR model) achieved 53 percent on the same benchmark.

Even so, OpenAI claims further progress on its AI model capabilities over time. In December, OpenAI announced o3, its latest SR model that impressed some AI experts by reportedly performing well on very difficult math benchmarks, but it has not yet been released for public examination.

Superintelligence as well?

Altman's post follows his September prediction that the AI industry may develop superintelligence "in a few thousand days." Superintelligence is an industry term for a hypothetical AI model that could far surpass human intelligence. Former OpenAI Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever founded a company around the pursuit of the technology last year.

Altman addressed the topic in his latest post as well.

"We are beginning to turn our aim beyond [AGI], to superintelligence in the true sense of the word," he wrote. "We love our current products, but we are here for the glorious future. With superintelligence, we can do anything else. Superintelligent tools could massively accelerate scientific discovery and innovation well beyond what we are capable of doing on our own and in turn massively increase abundance and prosperity."

Despite frequent and necessary skepticism from critics, Altman has been responsible for at least one verifiable tech catalyst: the release of ChatGPT, which served as an unexpected tipping point, he says, that brought AI to the masses and launched our current AI-obsessed tech era. Even if OpenAI doesn't get to AGI as soon as Altman thinks, there's no doubt that OpenAI has taken the technology to unexpected places and spurred wide-ranging research on AI models in the tech industry.

"We started OpenAI almost nine years ago because we believed that AGI was possible and that it could be the most impactful technology in human history," he reflected in his post. "At the time, very few people cared, and if they did, it was mostly because they thought we had no chance of success."

Read the whole story
freeAgent
3 hours ago
reply
If Sam's AGI commits a crime, who goes to jail?
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Cartesian Pickup Advice

1 Share

A philosophy webcomic about the inevitable anguish of living a brief life in an absurd world. Also Jokes

420

Cartesian Pickup Advice

Cartesian incel: If your eyes have been deceived once (by a woman wearing makeup), then how can you ever trust your senses again?

Follow on bluesky

Make sure to follow me on BlueSky

Read the whole story
freeAgent
3 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Wind and Truth by Brandon Sanderson

1 Share
The war between the forces of Odium and those of the Knights Radiant has entered a dangerous new phase. Dalinar Kholin has negotiated a contest of champions, himself against Odium. Both sides have only ten days to seize as much territory as possible before this war will come to an end. But a devastating reversal has taken place which the Knights have no knowledge of: the shard of Odium has changed hands, and its new shardholder is a cannier, smarter foe far more willing to bend and flex than its former owner. From Shinovar in the west to the Shattered Plains in the east, the fate of Roshar, and perhaps the entire cosmere, hangs in the balance.


That sound you can hear right now is of reinforced bookshelf supports being delivered to hundreds of thousands of SFF fans across the globe. Bookshelves creak, strained by a weight they were never designed to hold. Yes, a new Stormlight Archive novel from Brandon Sanderson has arrived.

At 1,330 pages in hardcover and just a tad under half a million words by itself, Wind and Truth is the longest book in the series to date. It's also the most interesting. Whilst this is only the fifth of ten books in the series (and the seventeenth of potentially forty in the much wider Cosmere setting), it's the end of the first major story arc and has to "park" the various storylines for a planned ten-year timeskip before the sixth Stormlight book picks things back up. That book probably won't appear until the 2030s, with Sanderson committed to writing a new Mistborn trilogy and two sequels to Elantris before resuming this series.

In this sense Wind and Truth is Stormlight's equivalent to George R.R. Martin's A Storm of Swords, which also had to "park" a massive array of character and plot arcs in the Song of Ice and Fire series in preparation for a five-year timeskip which, in that case, never happened (and arguably caused problems that series is partially still confronting two and a half decades later, but that's a debate for elsewhere). It is a climax book that has to deliver massive payoffs and tee up the second half of the series but can't actually end the series.

In some senses it delivers: Wind and Truth is a massive countdown to a continent-shaking confrontation between Dalinar, the highly redoubtable, reformed war criminal turned leader of the resurrected Knights Radiant, and Odium, the principle force of evil on not just this planet, but the entire Cosmere setting. But, in arguably Sanderson's most satisfying plot twist to date, the previous incarnation of Odium was killed at the end of the prior novel, Rhythm of War, and replaced by what had appeared to have been a minor, sympathetic semi-antagonist up to that point, one with detailed knowledge of Dalinar and his allies. This creates a situation in which our heroes are fighting an enemy they literally know exists, and knows them better than they do themselves.

This results in Odium launching a complex, multi-pronged scheme to defeat and conquer as many of Dalinar's allies as possible, as fast as possible, and their increasingly desperate attempts to fend him off and survive until the deadline, with the slight problem that Dalinar still has no idea on how to actually win that confrontation when it arrives.

This structure gives us a ticking clock element, and four primary storylines that continue through the novel: Dalinar entering the Cognitive Realm to learn the deep backstory to the setting and figure out how Odium was defeated, or at least checkmated, in the past (with Shallan unwittingly tagging along); Kaladin and Szeth visiting Szeth's homeland of Shinovar to find out what's going on there; Adolin leading a desperate battle in western Roshar to fend off Odium's forces; and Sigzil and the rest of Kaladin's old Bridge Four unit leading a similar desperate battle in eastern Roshar. Characters like Lift, Wit/Hoid, Renarin and Rlain, Venli, Jasnah and Navani also have notable subplots.

This makes for a busy novel that - somewhat - justifies its yak-stunning length. This is an improvement over Oathbringer, which probably could have been reduced in length by half without losing anything too major, and Rhythm of War (aka Die Hard with a Sprengeance) which was not far off the same. Wind and Truth has a lot going on and Sanderson juggles it mostly quite well. That's not to say the novel doesn't occasionally feel indulgent: strategy meetings where characters debate the plot rather than getting on with the plot recall some of the sludgier moments of The Wheel of Time, and the elaborate Cognitive Realm TED Talks on Ancient Rosharan History start indulging in redundancy when we get to revisit the entire storyline a second time later in the novel, from a different POV.

The plots themselves also vary in quality. Kaladin and Szeth's trip around Shinovar feels like a different, almost completely self-contained novel, one that takes place in two time periods as we see both Szeth's flashback storyline and his present-day storyline, which are very similar and take place in many of the same locations (again causing a feeling of redundancy). The divorcing of their storyline from the rest of the novel makes it feel a bit disconnected, at least until the end makes its relevance clear. This storyline also drags, especially as Kaladin has been learning the art of therapy and gets to try out his various new learned techniques on Szath's numerous neuroses with all the enthusiasm (and ill-advised lack of forethought) of someone who's watched a few too many YouTube videos on mental health and not read enough deep studies or done enough actual studying. Prioritising mental health is a good thing, and that message in one of the biggest-selling modern fantasy series is laudable, but the emphasis placed on it sometimes feels incongruous, if not pace-killing.

Adolin's storyline is probably the most traditional hoo-rah epic fantasy one here, with lots of military planning, cool action sequences, epic battles and desperate fights for survival against overwhelming odds. This sequence is great (you can almost see an anime adaptation in your head as it goes on), but is potentially a bit overwrought by the time the battle has been going on for eight or nine days and eight or nine hundred pages.

Dalinar's storyline is the most important in the book, but also the vaguest. Much of his story has him viewing narrated histories about Roshar's deep past that you can almost imagine Ken Burns narrating, which is both catnip to lore...cats, but potentially boring to everyone else, so Sanderson interjects a lot of action by having Dalinar stalked by the mysterious Ghostbloods and having Shallan acting behind the scenes to stop them. A lot of this stuff is pretty good, but again you start to ponder if this could have been structured differently (especially when Dalinar gets to experience everything he's just seen again, but from a different point of view).

The final major storyline is the best-paced, with Sigzil and his team returning to visit the Shattered Plains (the evocative setting for the first book in the series, The Way of Kings) and getting embroiled in a humdinger of a complicated battle, which is further thrown for a loop by the arrival of a third side.

We flip between these storylines quite regularly, allowing all to be serviced on a frequent basis, although this can result in plot-whiplash as the reader is thrown from city to city to illusionary dream dimension to intense battle to tragic deaths to cutesy romantic exchanges and strained humour without much regard for tonal consistency.

The book is a lot even by the standards of the series so far, which can both breathlessly enjoyable but also frustrating, especially for those who find some storylines deeply engrossing and others much less so.

This is also the book which does feel like it breaks Sanderson's (already shaky) long-ago promise that readers would not have to have an in-depth knowledge of the entire Cosmere universe to enjoy any given series or even novel within it. We even spend brief parts of the book visiting Scadrial to set up the forthcoming Mistborn: Ghostbloods trilogy, and allusions to other books come thick and fast. At one point the book stops to give us a potted plot summary of Warbreaker (where the sword Nightblood first appeared), whilst one part of the ending exists to set up the events of the previously-published The Sunlit Man. This may be good from the point of view of the wider Cosmere setting, with Sanderson incorporating more elements into Stormlight that were originally planned for other books and series (thus reducing the total number of books he still has to write in the setting, which was starting to look a bit over-ambitious), but those Stormlight fans who weren't keen on Mistborn or his other works may be less happy about those wider setting elements colliding with Roshar here.

Of course, for those who love the interconnected elements of Sanderson's wider universe, this book will be outrageously enjoyable, satisfying, and prime Wiki-fodder.

Summarising a book of this breadth and heft is tricky, especially when you want to avoid "1990s flight sim expansion pack review syndrome" ("if you liked the last thing in the series, you'll like this too, I guess"). If you've read the previous books in the series, you're going to read this, and you'll have a good time; Sanderson sceptics will find little here to convince them otherwise. Wind & Truth (****) is better than the last two Stormlight books, but not as strong as The Way of Kings. Sanderson's weaknesses - a prosaic prose style, occasionally jarring use of modern language mixed in with more formal syntax, haphazard characterisation - are still present and correct, but his strengths are here as well: impressive worldbuilding, fascinating magic, explosive action sequences and satisfying moments of plot revelation and payoff. This novel also has an impressive amount of incident going on, paced surprisingly well for the book's staggering length. The book is available worldwide now.

Thank you for reading The Wertzone. To help me provide better content, please consider contributing to my Patreon page and other funding methods.
Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 day ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

South Korea fact of the day

1 Share

South Korea in 2024 saw 242,334 babies born, marking the first increase in the annual figure since 2015, as the country struggles to improve its plummeting birth rate that is among the worst in the world.

The official figure for childbirths rose by 7,295 from 235,039 in 2023, a 3.1 percent increase, according to the Ministry of the Interior and Safety.

And yet, it is not so easy to win this one:

The country also saw 360,757 deaths in the year, resulting in the overall population shrinking for a fifth straight year since 2020…

While the rebound in childbirths offers a glimpse of hope in terms of the population decline, the country continued to get older. The average age for Koreans in 2024 was 45.3 years old, up from average age of 44.8 the previous year.

Here is the full story.

The post South Korea fact of the day appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
2 days ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

France fact of the day

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Consumption of red wine in France has fallen by about 90 per cent since the 1970s, according to Conseil Interprofessionnel du vin de Bordeaux (CIVB), an industry association. Total wine consumption, spanning reds, whites and rosés, is down more than 80 per cent in France since 1945, according to survey data from Nielsen, and the decline is accelerating, with Generation Z purchasing half the volume bought by older millennials.

Here is more from Adrienne Klasa at the FT.  You will note these are declines from large numbers:

“With every generation in France we see the change. If the grandfather drank 300 litres of red wine per year, the father drinks 180 litres and the son, 30 litres,” said CIVB board member Jean-Pierre Durand.

In the USA, the Surgeon General is calling for cancer warnings on alcohol (NYT).

The post France fact of the day appeared first on Marginal REVOLUTION.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
2 days ago
reply
That is a pretty wild fact of the day. I had no idea.
Los Angeles, CA
mareino
1 day ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories