12128 stories
·
23 followers

I'm Dying of ALS. Knowing I Can Decide When To End My Life Brought Me Back From the Dead.

1 Share

One Friday morning in September 2023, my neurologist told me she suspected that I had ALS. I was completely healthy—or so I thought—and in the prime of my life. I had two adult children, a great career, and a wonderful marriage. I was 56, and both of my parents were still alive. My diagnosis was confirmed two months later. I felt as if I had just been told not only that I would die, but that I would be tortured to death, and that it would drag out over several years.

I was the chief clinical officer at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, trained as an internist and geriatrician, and I've cared for many dying patients. Of all the people in the universe, you'd think I would be the person most ready to hear the news that I had a terminal condition. Instead, I discovered that the intellectual awareness of death and the emotional reality of facing it yourself are completely unrelated.

I thought about all the patients I had cared for with ALS or similar neuromuscular diseases—mentally intact but imprisoned in their own bodies, unable to move, swallow, speak, or breathe. I remembered the look of desperation in their eyes when they could no longer communicate.

About a year after my diagnosis, joy returned to my life thanks to the support of my family and friends, therapy, antidepressants, and a daily meditation practice. But the most important factor in my emotional recovery was gaining the knowledge that I can make the decision to end my own life when my suffering becomes unbearable.

When I got my diagnosis, I had a vision of my own death: I would be choking on my own saliva, gasping for air, unable to communicate my needs, my eyes filling with panic, as my family and friends looked on helplessly.

Now I know that my death will happen on my own terms. The source of my suffering was that everything was being taken away from me, and that there was nothing I could do about it. Now I know that I get to determine when my life will end, and that knowledge gives me great peace.

The Day My Life Split in Two

When patients receive a life-changing diagnosis, small details of that moment—where they were standing, the blaring fluorescent lights, the glare of a screen—haunt them. For me, it was a 10-word sentence, delivered by my neurologist that fateful Friday morning, that will repeat in my head for the rest of my life: "I'd like you to be evaluated at an ALS center."

A month earlier, I had been on a work trip in Nepal when my leg started spasming. I figured I must have aggravated something in my spine on the long journey from New York City to Kathmandu. A couple of weeks later, I was back in New York, and my leg symptoms were worse. I went to see my primary care doctor, who calmly, but urgently, referred me to the neurologist. She saw me on a Thursday, sent me to get a bunch of MRIs that evening, and then I saw her again the following day. It was at that appointment that she uttered my death sentence. 

I walked 40 blocks back to my apartment, trying to make sense of what I had just heard. My wife was home, and when I told her the news, we held each other and wept uncontrollably. That's all I remember doing for the next month. This wonderful, beautiful life we had built together would be coming to a premature end. I would need to tell my kids, who were 23 and 21 at the time. And I would need to tell my parents, who, in their 80s, would now have to face every parent's nightmare: losing a child.

Also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, ALS is universally fatal. Most people die within three to five years of diagnosis after an inexorable march through total paralysis, the loss of the ability to speak, to eat, and ultimately to breathe. I've cared for all sorts of people with terminal illnesses, and I couldn't imagine a more horrific disease to die from than ALS. 

Every waking moment, I veered between an overwhelming sense of dread and near-total panic. But I came to realize that I didn't fear death; I feared being imprisoned in a body that had died around me.

Image: Kevin Alexander

Reclaiming Control

One day in 2024, my thinking suddenly shifted. I realized that there are 13 jurisdictions in America where Medical Aid in Dying, or MAiD, is legal. I could establish residency in one of them if I needed to.

Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, the first in the nation, was signed into law in 1994 and took effect in 1997. Since then, similar laws have been passed in another 12 states and the District of Columbia. MAiD allows terminally ill adults, with less than six months to live, to request and receive a prescription for a lethal cocktail of medications. Once they ingest the medications, they typically fall fast asleep within minutes and die within an hour or two. People requesting this must be mentally competent and must be able to self-ingest the medications. In most states, there is a mandatory waiting period after the initial request, and two doctors must agree that the person requesting the medications meets all necessary criteria. 

Opponents of MAiD worry that the current laws will turn into a slippery slope, ultimately including people who are not terminally ill but who are suffering because of a mental illness or a disability. Thankfully, we have a nearly 30-year history of these laws and a wealth of data and experience. These concerns are unfounded. MAiD laws have proven durable and consistent, and there has been no slippery slope.  

MAiD isn't used because people lack access to hospice and palliative care. It turns out that nearly 90 percent of people choosing to end their lives on their own terms are already in hospice when they do so. MAiD, hospice, and palliative care are not mutually exclusive. 

I have an excellent palliative care physician. When I qualify for hospice care, I will gratefully receive it. But I know that, even with the very best of these services, there is no therapeutic path to free me from becoming completely locked in.

Knowing that I can avail myself of MAiD when I decide that enough is enough has freed me of immeasurable degrees of fear and dread. It has allowed me to get back to living and to make the most of the time I have left.

Image: Kevin Alexander

Embracing Life in a Dying Body

I had lived and worked in New York City and the surrounding suburbs for my entire career, but I dreamed of having a house in the country because I love growing vegetables and caring for animals. A year before my diagnosis, my wife and I bought a piece of land in Columbia County, a rural area in New York State. When I found out that I had ALS, the house wasn't complete, so we were still able to make all the necessary modifications to make it accessible as my condition progresses.

We moved in a year ago, and are raising chickens and goats. Once MAiD becomes legal in New York in 2026, I will have the privilege of creating the exact conditions I want for my own death. I want to be out in the field with our animals, watching tree swallows and bluebirds fly in and out of their boxes. I want my wife and my daughters by my side.

In December 2025, Gov. Kathy Hochul (D–N.Y.) announced an agreement with the state's legislative leaders on a MAiD law. The State Assembly and Senate just need to pass the new version of the bill and send it to Hochul's desk, and it will take effect six months after it is signed.

If the law didn't pass, I was prepared to move to another state and establish residency. But most of the people in the 37 states without MAiD laws don't have the resources or ability to move elsewhere to die, which is why I've decided to become an advocate for MAiD in states where it isn't yet legal.

MAiD gave me the freedom to determine my own fate, and today I'm living more vibrantly than I could have imagined on that horrible Friday morning in my neurologist's office. I meditate. I exercise carefully. I spend time with my wife and daughters, extended family, and friends. I laugh. I advocate. I build fences. I rest in the sun. I savor good meals. I watch every bird that lands on this property as if it's the first one I've ever seen.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
2 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
LinuxGeek
1 hour ago
Only blind fanatics would deny a person the right to choose a painless death, rather than endure a terminal illness. Forcing someone to live can be equivalent to torture.
Share this story
Delete

Feds Create Drone No Fly Zone That Would Stop People Filming ICE

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Advertisement

The FAA has altered a no fly zone designation that was originally created for US military bases to apply to DHS units.

Feds Create Drone No Fly Zone That Would Stop People Filming ICE
Read the whole story
freeAgent
3 hours ago
reply
How is someone going to know that their drone is flying over ICE agents or their vehicles?
Los Angeles, CA
LinuxGeek
3 hours ago
I've got an idea! Feds should create an app that constantly updates locations of no fly zones and alerts phones in the area. ;-)
acdha
47 minutes ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Lululemon’s founder seeks Advent’s ouster in proxy fight

1 Share

The Scoop

Lululemon founder-turned-activist Chip Wilson is trying to excise private equity firm Advent from the beleaguered athletic apparel company’s board as part of an ongoing proxy fight.

Wilson, who quit Lululemon’s board in 2015 but remains the company’s second-biggest shareholder, launched a proxy war late last year in a bid to remake the board while it looked for a new CEO. While Wilson has said he doesn’t want a board seat for himself, he is making it clear that he will not consider any settlement with the company unless two legacy Advent-linked directors, including David Mussafer, resign, according to people familiar with Wilson’s thinking.

Know More

Advent has had a long and successful relationship with Lululemon and Wilson. It was a partnership that helped Lululemon go public, made Wilson one of Canada’s wealthiest businessmen, and minted billions for both parties.

But Wilson has soured on Advent in recent years, and now views the private equity firm’s influence and lingering presence as a personification of Lululemon’s ailments. He lays Lululemon’s “loss of cool,” as Wilson wrote in a WSJ ad last year, at the feet of Mussafer’s focus on appeasing Wall Street analysts rather than thinking ahead about what customers will want to wear, the people close to him say.

Wilson has singled out the continuing presence of Advent managing partner David Mussafer, who is Lululemon’s lead independent director, and Lululemon chair Marti Morfitt, as making any settlement deal impossible, those people said. Mussafer took his seat as part of a deal Advent struck with the company more than a decade ago; Morfitt, while not formally affiliated with Advent, was brought onto the board of another Advent portfolio company and is seen by Wilson as working in lockstep with Mussafer. (The separation of Lululemon’s board chair and lead independent roles itself is a legacy of that deal Advent struck.)

Wilson’s frustrations are compounded by Advent’s spotty record in the consumer space, the people say ; another Advent name, the haircare brand Olaplex, has seen its stock collapse since its 2022 IPO. (Mussafer and two other Lululemon directors are also on Olaplex’s board.)

Wilson has publicly nominated three candidates to Lululemon’s board, including former On Running co-CEO Marc Maurer and ESPN’s ex-marketing boss, Laura Gentile.

Wilson isn’t alone in his activist fight at Lululemon, whose shares have halved over the last year. Activist investor Elliott has a more than $1 billion stake and is also mounting its own campaign, according to another person familiar with the matter. Neither Elliott nor Wilson have had substantive contact with each other, some of the people said.

A spokesperson for Wilson declined to comment. A representative for Lululemon also declined to comment. The company previously told The Wall Street Journal that it has “engaged extensively” with Wilson but that he declined the board’s offer to evaluate his nominees privately.

Step Back

Wilson founded Lululemon in 1998, helping to create an entire category around athleisure and laying the groundwork for what would become a $24 billion company. But most of his tenure was marked with controversy and board disagreements over how to run the business.

In 2005, Wilson stepped down from the CEO role, selling nearly half the company to Advent and Highland Capital Partners for $93 million. Two years later, the company went public and Wilson made billions — but clashes between Wilson and the board continued for years. In 2014, following the now-infamous see-through yoga pants episode, Advent again stepped in to buy half Wilson’s stake for $845 million. In return, Advent got two board seats and Mussafer became co-chairman of the board. (Wilson stepped down from the board in 2015 and Advent has since sold down its stake in the company.)

While Lululemon’s shares soared for most of Mussafer’s time as chair, US sales have stalled and competitors like Vuori and Alo Yoga have stolen market share. The company is searching for a new CEO to stage a turnaround.

Rohan’s view

The founder’s dilemma is real: Monetizing a business often means yielding control. People like Starbucks’ Howard Schultz (technically not the founder, but might as well have been) never really could let go of his baby and struggled with most of his successors. That’s why Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg and his tech brethren have opted for dual-class structures that protect their control while making them wealthy.

Wilson doesn’t have either of those options — and despite the fact that many of his frustrations stem from Wall Street-types mucking up a culture of cool that he pioneered, he’s turning to a decidedly Wall Street maneuver to fix what’s broken at Lululemon.

Room for Disagreement

Retailers and consumer brands are inherently emotional, and make their money by winning consumer’s hearts, with their wallets following shortly thereafter. While tech founders can sell their upstarts and just launch another company, it can be harder for founders of consumer brands to just step aside and watch their brands melt away.



Read the whole story
freeAgent
16 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Too old to be presidenting

2 Shares

The president is tweeting nonsense again.

People will say, and have said, all sorts of things about this. That it's bad policy, or dangerous policy, or completely counterproductive. And partisan morons will defend the policy. And other partisan morons who don't want to defend the policy will say zany stuff like the president has the right to make foreign policy and other such pap, as if wisdom springs from legality and there's no room or reason to criticize the legal.

But for me, it just sounds like the ramblings of an old man. As I tweeted, if an old neighbor said this to you at a neighborhood party, you'd smile and nod, and then tell your wife to check and makes sure he isn't living alone.

This isn't complicated:

  1. Trump is too old to be president. So was Biden. It's not impossible for someone who is 80 to do the job of president, but it is impossible to know that someone that age will still be able to do the job 3 years later. The cognitive decline of people in their late 70's is steep and quick.

  2. Trump has obviously declined in the last five years. It's jarring to watch a tape of him during his first term, he looks like a completely different person. It has been more gradual than Biden's decline, and that has made it less starkly obvious.

  3. I don't trust Trump---and I didn't trust Biden---to throw in the towel when they can no longer do the job. It's just not in the nature of a president to think that way, anymore than it is for a starting pitcher to admit he's out of gas. And I trust the staff around the president even less; as the saying goes, it is very difficult to make a man understand something when his job specifically depends on not understand it.

  4. We shouldn't leave this to the voters. There are too many cross-cutting substantive and partisan concerns that get in the way of principled avoidance of too-old presidents. We've now seen both parties nominate and win elections with people who were plainly in the danger zone. I'm in favor of a constitutional amendment barring anyone from becoming president who is over 72 at the time of inauguration. And don't bother me with any ageism crap.

  5. I don't believe we need similar age limits in the legislature; I wouldn't have a problem with them---one huge distortion/bias in Congress is how old the Member are---but old people can do the job of representative. The problem on the executive side is that there are too many emergency decisions and too many situations where less-than-perfect faculties are a problem. I saw Bobby Byrd many times when he was essentially a corpse in a wheelchair in the Senate. Did it reduce his capacity to represent West Virginia? Sure, on on the margins. Did it endanger the nation? Not even close.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 day ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Daughter of Thai grandad Vicha Ratanapakdee killed in San Francisco unhappy with local court’s verdict

1 Comment

Thai granddad Vicha, 84, was killed on a San Francisco morning walk in a shove caught on video. Jury clears Antoine Watson of murder, convicts… Read More ›

The post Daughter of Thai grandad Vicha Ratanapakdee killed in San Francisco unhappy with local court’s verdict appeared first on Thai Examiner.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 day ago
reply
If he didn't mean to kill the guy, maybe he should have called 911 immediately instead of walking away without rendering any sort of aid. I'd say the boundary between manslaughter and murder was crossed when he did that.
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

This 5-foot lamp is a supersized tribute to the world’s most iconic pen

1 Comment
The Seletti Bic Lamp hanging from a ceiling over an office desk.
The Bic Lamp can be hung, mounted, or used as a vertical standing lamp. | Image: Seletti

Seletti, an Italian design brand known for everything from furniture to tableware, has debuted an unusual tribute to an icon of design: the Bic Cristal pen. To celebrate its 75th anniversary, Seletti has supersized the pen and replaced its ink cartridge with a long LED-filled tube to illuminate your living room, office, or that closet where they keep all the stationery at work.

The Bic Lamp, as it's simply called, was introduced at the 2026 Maison&Objet show in Paris - think CES, but for interior designers. Seletti says it was created at a 12:1 scale, which makes it just shy of six feet long given the Bic Cristal pen typically measures arou …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 day ago
reply
This is, honestly, pretty cool. I could definitely see hanging these in an office.
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories