12096 stories
·
23 followers

Kiefer Sutherland arrested after allegedly assaulting ride-hail driver in Hollywood

1 Share

Kiefer Sutherland arrested on suspicion of making criminal threats after altercation with ride-hail driver in Hollywood

Read the whole story
freeAgent
11 minutes ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Elon Musk monetizes CSAM on X and Grok

1 Share

Casey Newton: Grok gets blocked

On Friday, following days of mounting outrage over Grok generating sexualized deepfakes of women and children, X said it would restrict the feature to paying subscribers.

I know he's a ghoul, but what the fuck is Elon Musk doing?

This is absolute garbage. He's created a tool that generates CSAM and non-consensual sexual images of people and distributes them as public images anyone can see with ease. He has built it into his product, he has laughed about how funny it is, and the slightest adjustment he has made to this is to make people pay to use this. This is not any sort of remediation of this feature, this is Musk seeing something people are doing that is genuinely sick, and has decided the best way to handle it is to monetize it.

alt

For what it’s worth, Apple is monetizing it as well.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
14 minutes ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Eric Adams was accused of bribery, now he’s rug-pulled NYC Token

1 Share

Eric Adams, the former mayor of New York, has apparently rug-pulled his newly launched crypto token, NYC Token.

NYC Token, describes itself as “the digital heartbeat of New York City” while Adams himself has called it a token that was “built to fight the rapid spread of antisemitism and anti-Americanism across this country and now in New York City.”

At no point in the announcement video, however, does Adams explain mechanistically how this token will achieve this.

The website for the token claims it will “support awareness campaigns, educational programs, and community initiatives that work to eliminate antisemitism and promote understanding and respect.”

It continues, “Through partnerships with community organizations and educational institutions, we will help fund programs that educate about Jewish history, culture, and the importance of standing against hate in all its forms, fostering a city where everyone can thrive.”

Read more: New York’s pro-Bitcoin mayor is already pissing off liberals

Shortly after the launch of the token, X user RuneCrypto_ observed that the liquidity for this token was withdrawn mere minutes after launch.

Rune added that “apparently he’s not using app.anyswap.bot to mix funds privately.”

This isn’t the first crypto token that Adams has involved himself with; before launching NYC Token, he was a promoter of NYC Coin.

This coin, associated with the now defunct CityCoins project, promised to give a portion of its token sale proceeds back to New York City. A similar token, MiamiCoin, was subsequently launched and was promoted by the city’s mayor Francis Suarez.

These tokens were delisted from all exchanges as of 2023.

This isn’t the first time that Adams has been accused of inappropriate or illegal business practices, as he was previously indicted for “bribery and campaign finance offenses.”

The Donald Trump administration dropped its case against Adams after the Department of Justice, under the direction of Emil Bove, sent a memorandum to the Southern District of New York that claimed the charges had “unduly restricted Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime.”

Adams has yet to make a public statement about the rug-pull of this NYC Token.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

The post Eric Adams was accused of bribery, now he’s rug-pulled NYC Token appeared first on Protos.



Read the whole story
freeAgent
15 minutes ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Grade inflation sentences to ponder - Marginal REVOLUTION

2 Shares

Next, we consider the effects of grade inflation on future outcomes. Passing grade inflation reduces the likelihood of being held back, increases high school graduation, and increases initial enrollment in two-year colleges. Mean grade inflation reduces future test scores, reduces the likelihood of graduating from high school, reduces college enrollment, and ultimately reduces earnings.

Here is the full paper by Jeffrey T. Denning, Rachel Nesbit, Nolan Pope, and Merrill Warnick.  Via Kris Gulati.

Read the whole story
mareino
9 hours ago
reply
Washington, District of Columbia
freeAgent
11 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Signal creator Moxie Marlinspike wants to do for AI what he did for messaging - Ars Technica

1 Share

Moxie Marlinspike—the pseudonym of an engineer who set a new standard for private messaging with the creation of the Signal Messenger—is now aiming to revolutionize AI chatbots in a similar way.

His latest brainchild is Confer, an open source AI assistant that provides strong assurances that user data is unreadable to the platform operator, hackers, law enforcement, or any other party other than account holders. The service—including its large language models and back-end components—runs entirely on open source software that users can cryptographically verify is in place.

Data and conversations originating from users and the resulting responses from the LLMs are encrypted in a trusted execution environment (TEE) that prevents even server administrators from peeking at or tampering with them. Conversations are stored by Confer in the same encrypted form, which uses a key that remains securely on users’ devices.

Like Signal, the under-the-hood workings of Confer are elegant in their design and simplicity. Signal was the first end-user privacy tool that made using it a snap. Prior to that, using PGP email or other options to establish encrypted channels between two users was a cumbersome process that was easy to botch. Signal broke that mold. Key management was no longer a task users had to worry about. Signal was designed to prevent even the platform operators from peering into messages or identifying users’ real-world identities.

“Inherent data collectors”

All major platforms are required to turn over user data to law enforcement or private parties in a lawsuit when either provides a valid subpoena. Even when users opt out of having their data stored long term, parties to a lawsuit can compel the platform to store it, as the world learned last May when a court ordered OpenAI to preserve all ChatGPT users’ logs—including deleted chats and sensitive chats logged through its API business offering. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has said such rulings mean even psychotherapy sessions on the platform may not stay private. Another carve out to opting out: AI platforms like Google Gemini may have humans read chats.

Data privacy expert Em (she keeps her last name off the Internet) called AI assistants the “archnemesis” of data privacy because their utility relies on assembling massive amounts of data from myriad sources, including individuals.

“AI models are inherent data collectors,” she told Ars. “They rely on large data collection for training, improvements, operations, and customizations. More often than not, this data is collected without clear and informed consent (from unknowing training subjects or from platform users), and is sent to and accessed by a private company with many incentives to share and monetize this data.”

The lack of user-control is especially problematic given the nature of LLM interactions, Marlinspike says. Users often treat dialogue as an intimate conversation. Users share their thoughts, fears, transgressions, business dealings, and deepest, darkest secrets as if AI assistants are trusted confidants or personal journals. The interactions are fundamentally different from traditional web search queries, which usually adhere to a transactional model of keywords in and links out.

He likens AI use to confessing into a “data lake.”

Awaking from the nightmare that is today’s AI landscape

In response, Marlinspike has developed and is now trialing Confer. In much the way Signal uses encryption to make messages readable only to parties participating in a conversation, Confer protects user prompts, AI responses, and all data included in them. And just like Signal, there’s no way to tie individual users to their real-world identity through their email address, IP address, or other details.

“The character of the interaction is fundamentally different because it’s a private interaction,” Marlinspike told Ars. “It’s been really interesting and encouraging and amazing to hear stories from people who have used Confer and had life-changing conversations, in part because they haven’t felt free to include information in those conversations with sources like ChatGPT or they had insights using data that they weren’t really free to share with ChatGPT before but can using an environment like Confer.”

One of the main ingredients of Confer encryption is passkeys. The industry-wide standard generates a 32-byte encryption keypair that’s unique to each service a user logs in to. The public key is sent to the server. The private key is stored only on the user device, inside protected storage hardware that hackers (even those with physical access) can’t access. Passkeys provide two-factor authentication and can be configured to log in to an account with a fingerprint, face scan (both of which also stay securely on a device), or a device unlock PIN or passcode.

The private key allows the device to log in to Confer and encrypt all input and output with encryption that’s widely believed to be impossible to break. That allows users to store conversations on Confer servers with confidence that they can’t be read by anyone other than themselves. The storage allows conversations to sync across other devices the user owns. The code making this all work is available for anyone to inspect. It looks like this:


  const assertion = await navigator.credentials.get({
    mediation: "optional",
    publicKey: {
      challenge: crypto.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(32)),
      allowCredentials: [{ id: credId, type: "public-key" }],
      userVerification: "required",
      extensions: { prf: { eval: { first: new Uint8Array(salt) } } }
    }
  }) as PublicKeyCredential;

  const { prf } = assertion.getClientExtensionResults();
  const rawKey  = new Uint8Array(prf.results.first); 

This robust internal engine is fronted by a user interface (shown in the two images above) that’s deceptively simple. In just two strokes, a user is logged in, and all previous chats are decrypted. These chats are then available to any device logged in to the same account. This way, Confer can sync chats without compromising privacy. The ample 32 bytes of key material allow the private key to change regularly, a feature that allows for forward secrecy, meaning that in the event a key is compromised, an attacker cannot read previous or future chats.

The other main Confer ingredient is a TEE on the platform servers. TEEs encrypt all data and code flowing through the server CPU, protecting them from being read or modified by someone with administrative access to the machine. The Confer TEE also provides remote attestation. Remote attestation is a digital certificate sent by the server that cryptographically verifies that data and software are running inside the TEE and lists all software running on it.

On Confer, remote attestation allows anyone to reproduce the bit-by-bit outputs that confirm that the publicly available proxy and image software—and only that software—is running on the server. To further verify Confer is running as promised, each release is digitally signed and published in a transparency log.

Native support for Confer is available in the most recent versions of macOS, iOS, and Android. On Windows, users must install a third-party authenticator. Linux support also doesn’t exist, although this extension bridges that gap.

There are other private LLMs, but none from the big players

Another publicly available LLM offering E2EE is Lumo, provided by Proton, a European company that’s behind the popular encrypted email service. It adopts the same encryption engine used by Proton Mail, Drive, and Calendar. The internals of the engine are considerably more complicated than Confer because they rely on a series of both symmetric and asymmetric keys. The end result for the user is largely the same, however.

Once a user authenticates to their account, Proton says, all conversations, data, and metadata is encrypted with a symmetrical key that only the user has. Users can opt to store the encrypted data on Proton servers for device syncing or have it wiped immediately after the conversation is finished.

A third LLM provider promising privacy is Venice. It stores all data locally, meaning on the user device. No data is stored on the remote server.

Most of the big LLM platforms offer a means for users to exempt their conversations and data for marketing and training purposes. But as noted earlier, these promises often come with major carve-outs. Besides selected review by humans, personal data may still be used to enforce terms of service or for other internal purposes, even when users have opted out of default storage.

Given today’s legal landscape—which allows most data stored online to be obtained with a subpoena—and the regular occurrence of blockbuster data breaches by hackers, there can be no reasonable expectation that personal data remains private.

It would be great if big providers offered end-to-end encryption protections, but there’s currently no indication they plan to do so. Until then, a handful of smaller alternatives will keep user data out of the ever-growing data lake.

Read the whole story
freeAgent
12 hours ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete

Ex-CEO of Paul Newman-founded nonprofit for sick kids embezzled over $5 million, prosecutors say

1 Share

A former executive of a nonprofit camp for children with serious medical conditions is accused of embezzling more than $5 million from the organization and tampering with computer records to hide his crimes, according to prosecutors.

Lake Hughes-based organization the Painted Turtle, co-founded by actor Paul Newman in 1999, is a year-round camp that offers free programming for children struggling with medical challenges and relies on donations from individuals, corporations and foundations.

Offering outdoor activities and in-hospital games, the Painted Turtle describes itself as place where youth with life-threatening and chronic illnesses can “sing, dance, laugh, grow and discover their potential.”

In a statement released Monday, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office said former Painted Turtle chief executive Christopher L. Butler faces 15 felony counts, including grand theft and fraud. If convicted on all charges, Butler could serve more than 18 years in prison.

The $5.2-million fraud, prosecutors say, took place over the course of his seven-year tenure. A spokesperson for the Painted Turtle said Butler left the organization around July, and the district attorney filed the case in late December.

Prior to leaving the organization, Butler had acted as the organization’s controller, or supervisor of accounting, which would allow him to conceal his alleged embezzlement over the years, according to the official complaint.

Prosecutors say that a controller hired after Butler’s departure was the first to notify authorities of the alleged fraud.

In the complaint, prosecutors say that Butler embezzled the nonprofit of hundreds of thousands each year since he was hired, steadily increasing his illicit take to the highest point in 2022, when he allegedly stole nearly $1 million.

Butler wrote thousands in fraudulent checks in addition to the existing embezzlement, the complaint says.

In the last year of his suspected scheme, authorities accuse Butler of changing data on company computers to access money and destroy evidence relating to his fraud.

The fraud fell apart in August, when authorities say the new controller discovered “irregularities” in the financial records dating back to 2018, Butler’s first year with the organization.

That month, prosecutors say, Butler allegedly took drastic action that led to a grand theft charge: stealing the organization’s computers. The complaint also details that an additional $50,000 worth of the nonprofit’s property was stolen or damaged during this time.

Butler is being held on a $835,000 bail with his arraignment set for Thursday.

The Painted Turtle said in a statement that “serious financial crimes were committed by a former employee.” The organization says that it conducted investigations by independent auditors and cooperated with law enforcement.

“This was a shocking and saddening discovery for us. Our primary commitment is always to the children and families that we serve,” the organization stated.

The Painted Turtle spokesperson Glenn Bozarth says that the nonprofit plans to continue its programming after the investigation, although the fraud has left behind questions about whether lost funds and damages could be recovered.

“We all have the same question,” Bozarth said. “How can someone do this?”

Read the whole story
freeAgent
1 day ago
reply
Los Angeles, CA
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories